DTGRX vs. DRGVX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX).
DTGRX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Oct 12, 1997. DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001.
Performance
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | -7.70% | 27.20% | 30.78% | 59.98% | -46.44% | 12.62% | 69.80% | 52.82% | -1.47% | 42.50% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 2.32% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a -7.70% return, which is significantly lower than DRGVX's 2.32% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has outperformed DRGVX with an annualized return of 18.88%, while DRGVX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.96% annualized return.
DTGRX
- 1D
- 4.35%
- 1M
- -6.78%
- YTD
- -7.70%
- 6M
- -6.42%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 26.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 18.88%
DRGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than DRGVX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DTGRX vs. DRGVX — Risk / Return Rank
DTGRX
DRGVX
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DTGRX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.54 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.23 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.68 | 1.56 | +0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 6.92 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DTGRX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.10 | 1.07 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.81 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.69 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.61 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between DTGRX and DRGVX is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Dividend Comparison
DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.05%, more than DRGVX's 6.72% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund | 13.05% | 12.04% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.32% | 5.76% | 34.25% | 30.17% | 9.91% | 10.19% | 6.52% |
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.72% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
Drawdowns
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, which is greater than DRGVX's maximum drawdown of -42.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and DRGVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DTGRX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.23% | -42.60% | -40.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.27% | -12.22% | -5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.92% | -17.01% | -35.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.92% | -42.60% | -10.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.67% | -4.62% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.97% | -4.39% | -34.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.91% | 2.76% | +2.15% |
Volatility
DTGRX vs. DRGVX - Volatility Comparison
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 8.59% compared to BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) at 4.71%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRGVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DTGRX | DRGVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.59% | 4.71% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 9.13% | +8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.35% | 16.88% | +10.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.58% | 15.60% | +12.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.84% | 18.82% | +9.02% |