DTGRX vs. QQQ

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DTGRX (BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - DTGRX is a Technology Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX returned 21.51%/yr vs 20.46%/yr for QQQ. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DTGRX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.

Performance

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 14.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DTGRX having a 21.51% annualized return and QQQ not far behind at 20.46%.

DTGRX

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -6.39%
• 6M: 14.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 1Y: 36.17%
• 3Y*: 29.43%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 21.51%
• ALL TIME*: 12.61%

QQQ

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -1.76%
• 6M: 12.07%
• YTD: 14.23%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: 24.17%
• 5Y*: 14.45%
• 10Y*: 20.46%
• ALL TIME*: 10.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	$31.40B	$28.17B	$31.69B

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	19.24%	27.20%	30.78%	59.98%	-46.44%	12.62%	69.80%	52.82%	-1.47%	42.50%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	14.23%	20.77%	25.58%	54.86%	-32.58%	27.42%	48.62%	38.96%	-0.13%	32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between DTGRX and QQQ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999	0.93

The correlation between DTGRX and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DTGRX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTGRX

DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 35
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 55
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DTGRX	QQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.40	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	1.95	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.25	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	2.27	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.65	7.21	-1.56

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTGRX and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and QQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTGRX	QQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.23%	-82.97%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.25%	-11.96%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	-22.77%	-5.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.92%	-35.12%	-17.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.92%	-35.12%	-17.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.69%	-6.07%	-6.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.56%	-32.61%	-5.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.84%	3.76%	+2.08%

Volatility

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a higher volatility of 11.19% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.96%. This indicates that DTGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTGRX	QQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.19%	6.96%	+4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.28%	16.12%	+8.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.12%	19.37%	+8.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.64%	22.92%	+6.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.48%	22.51%	+5.97%

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTGRX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	10.10%	12.04%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	21.32%	5.76%	34.25%	30.17%	9.91%	10.19%	6.52%
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.43%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTGRX and QQQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, DTGRX and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DTGRX or QQQ?

DTGRX has higher volatility (11.19%) compared to QQQ (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.