DTGRX vs. SMH

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DTGRX (BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both funds - DTGRX is a Technology Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX returned 21.29%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DTGRX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

DTGRX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTGRX achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, DTGRX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 21.29%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.

DTGRX

• 1D: 6.06%
• 1M: -7.05%
• 6M: 14.60%
• YTD: 18.40%
• 1Y: 35.22%
• 3Y*: 28.78%
• 5Y*: 11.29%
• 10Y*: 21.29%
• ALL TIME*: 12.59%

SMH

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -8.74%
• 6M: 33.97%
• YTD: 50.09%
• 1Y: 90.95%
• 3Y*: 50.56%
• 5Y*: 33.46%
• 10Y*: 34.16%
• ALL TIME*: 11.06%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	$8.28B	$7.64B	$7.07B

DTGRX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	18.40%	27.20%	30.78%	59.98%	-46.44%	12.62%	69.80%	52.82%	-1.47%	42.50%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	50.09%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between DTGRX and SMH is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000	0.86

The correlation between DTGRX and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DTGRX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DTGRX

DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 37
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 87
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 84
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DTGRX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DTGRX	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	2.29	-1.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	2.70	-1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.36	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.71	3.58	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.37	14.64	-9.27

DTGRX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTGRX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DTGRX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTGRX drawdown since its inception was -83.23%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTGRX and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTGRX	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.23%	-84.96%	+1.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.25%	-24.62%	+6.37%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.31%	-35.74%	+7.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.92%	-45.30%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.92%	-45.30%	-7.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.30%	-19.19%	+5.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.57%	-40.89%	+2.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.79%	6.01%	-0.22%

Volatility

DTGRX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) is 11.50%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that DTGRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTGRX	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.50%	14.70%	-3.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.30%	33.13%	-8.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.12%	38.57%	-10.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.65%	36.50%	-6.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.48%	33.32%	-4.84%

DTGRX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTGRX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTGRX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

DTGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.17%, more than SMH's 0.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTGRX BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund	10.17%	12.04%	8.98%	0.00%	0.00%	21.32%	5.76%	34.25%	30.17%	9.91%	10.19%	6.52%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.20%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTGRX and SMH in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, DTGRX and SMH move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DTGRX or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to DTGRX (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTGRX dropped -83.23% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.