PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTEC vs. FNGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DTEC vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DTEC vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
-10.91%7.21%9.89%25.03%-31.29%4.89%44.12%4.95%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
-12.40%18.64%51.99%95.24%-40.32%16.96%101.99%10.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a -10.91% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's -12.40% return.


DTEC

1D
2.68%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-10.91%
6M
-15.33%
1Y
-0.40%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
-0.96%
10Y*

FNGS

1D
4.69%
1M
-4.21%
YTD
-12.40%
6M
-14.82%
1Y
19.65%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
15.68%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DTEC vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DTEC vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTEC
DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FNGS
FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTEC vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTECFNGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

0.73

-0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.14

1.26

-1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.17

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

0.84

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.11

2.59

-2.70

DTEC vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTEC Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTEC and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTECFNGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

0.73

-0.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

0.53

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.90

-0.59

Correlation

The correlation between DTEC and FNGS is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DTEC vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DTEC
ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF
0.04%0.04%0.45%0.27%0.02%0.26%0.37%0.43%0.33%
FNGS
MicroSectors FANG+ ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DTEC vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and FNGS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DTECFNGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.00%

-48.98%

+6.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.31%

-22.93%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.00%

-48.98%

+6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.94%

-19.32%

+1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-11.02%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

7.43%

-0.23%

Volatility

DTEC vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) is 5.85%, while MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) has a volatility of 8.31%. This indicates that DTEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DTECFNGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.85%

8.31%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

15.68%

-2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.71%

26.98%

-4.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.95%

29.97%

-8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

31.34%

-8.43%