DTEC vs. FNGS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DTEC (ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF) and FNGS (MicroSectors FANG+ ETN) are both exchange-traded funds - DTEC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while FNGS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NYSE FANG+ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DTEC returned 1.86%/yr vs 22.01%/yr for FNGS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTEC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for FNGS.

Performance

DTEC vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTEC achieves a 3.04% return, which is significantly lower than FNGS's 16.26% return.

DTEC

• 1D: -2.82%
• 1M: 7.50%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 1.62%
• 1Y: 5.25%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 1.86%
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 11.24%
• YTD: 16.26%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 29.78%
• 3Y*: 35.29%
• 5Y*: 22.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTEC vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF	3.04%	7.21%	9.89%	25.03%	-31.29%	4.89%	44.12%	4.95%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	16.26%	18.64%	51.99%	95.24%	-40.32%	16.96%	101.99%	10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between DTEC and FNGS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2019	0.76

The correlation between DTEC and FNGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DTEC vs. FNGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DTEC	FNGS
Technology	60.0%	59.9%
Industrials	13.7%	-
Healthcare	10.4%	-
Financial Services	8.5%	10.0%
Energy	3.5%	-
Utilities	3.1%	-
Communication Services	2.2%	28.8%
Real Estate	1.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	11.3%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-

Return for Risk

DTEC vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTEC

DTEC Risk / Return Rank: 12
DTEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DTEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Omega Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
DTEC Martin Ratio Rank: 12

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 34
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTEC vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTEC	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	1.46	-1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	2.03	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.26	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	1.30	-1.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.60	3.77	-3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTEC vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTEC Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTEC and FNGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTEC	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29	1.46	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	0.74	-0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	1.06	-0.67

Drawdowns

DTEC vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTEC drawdown since its inception was -42.00%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTEC and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTEC	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.00%	-48.98%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.31%	-22.93%	+2.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.47%	-26.77%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.00%	-48.98%	+6.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.09%	-1.61%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.31%	-10.87%	-2.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.71%	7.92%	+0.79%

Volatility

DTEC vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF (DTEC) has a higher volatility of 6.58% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 5.64%. This indicates that DTEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTEC	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.58%	5.64%	+0.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.30%	15.68%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.33%	20.49%	-2.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.07%	29.96%	-7.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.89%	31.12%	-8.23%

DTEC vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTEC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTEC vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

DTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
DTEC ALPS Disruptive Technologies ETF	0.04%	0.04%	0.45%	0.27%	0.02%	0.26%	0.37%	0.43%	0.33%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTEC and FNGS in my portfolio?

DTEC and FNGS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTEC or FNGS?

DTEC has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to FNGS (5.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTEC dropped -42.00% vs FNGS's -48.98%.

Which ETF is better, DTEC or FNGS?

On 5-year performance, FNGS leads with 22.01% vs 1.86% for DTEC. On fees, DTEC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FNGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DTEC or FNGS?

Over the 5-year period, FNGS has performed better with a 22.01% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DTEC or FNGS?

DTEC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FNGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DTEC or FNGS?

DTEC has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FNGS.

What is the main difference between DTEC and FNGS?

DTEC is categorized as Technology Equities, while FNGS is Large Cap Growth Equities. DTEC tracks Indxx Disruptive Technologies Index, while FNGS tracks NYSE FANG+ Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for DTEC and 0.58% for FNGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.