PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTD vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DTD has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 12.18%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 9.91% annualized return.


DTD

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.79%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.93%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.18%

GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
10.02%14.25%18.56%10.63%-3.83%26.26%2.45%28.19%-6.47%17.35%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DTD and GCOW is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016

0.76

The correlation between DTD and GCOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DTD vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DTD
GCOW

Financial Services

18.8%

-

Technology

18.5%
0.9%

Healthcare

11.5%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
17.1%

Industrials

8.6%
12.4%

Energy

8.4%
24.4%

Communication Services

7.4%
14.6%

Utilities

5.9%
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
4.6%

Real Estate

5.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
7.3%

Financial Services

DTD
18.8%
GCOW

-

Technology

DTD
18.5%
GCOW
0.9%

Healthcare

DTD
11.5%
GCOW
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

DTD
8.7%
GCOW
17.1%

Industrials

DTD
8.6%
GCOW
12.4%

Energy

DTD
8.4%
GCOW
24.4%

Communication Services

DTD
7.4%
GCOW
14.6%

Utilities

DTD
5.9%
GCOW
4.1%

Consumer Cyclical

DTD
5.6%
GCOW
4.6%

Real Estate

DTD
5.2%
GCOW

-

Basic Materials

DTD
1.5%
GCOW
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTDGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

5.71

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

15.05

-0.54

DTD vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTD Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTD and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTDGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.52

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.92

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.61

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.59

-0.06

Drawdowns

DTD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTDGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-37.64%

-20.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-4.77%

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

-12.35%

-2.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-21.48%

+5.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.29%

-37.64%

+0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-2.73%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-5.84%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.81%

-0.29%

Volatility

DTD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.13%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTDGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

2.85%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

7.99%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29%

10.81%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

13.49%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.20%

+0.01%

DTD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.87%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOW has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to DTD (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.18% vs 9.91% for GCOW. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 1.87% for DTD.

DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTD and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer