DTD vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DTD (WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DTD returned 12.21%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for FNDF. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DTD charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

DTD vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than FNDF's 20.97% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DTD having a 12.21% annualized return and FNDF not far behind at 11.80%.

DTD

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 6M: 10.86%
• 1Y: 23.27%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 12.21%

FNDF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTD vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund	10.81%	14.25%	18.56%	10.63%	-3.83%	26.26%	2.45%	28.19%	-6.47%	17.35%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.97%	40.99%	2.29%	20.22%	-7.78%	14.97%	3.61%	18.46%	-14.21%	23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DTD and FNDF is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.77

The correlation between DTD and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DTD vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DTD	FNDF
Financial Services	18.8%	16.7%
Technology	18.5%	11.1%
Healthcare	11.5%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	6.9%
Industrials	8.6%	15.9%
Energy	8.4%	12.3%
Communication Services	7.4%	4.9%
Utilities	5.9%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	10.7%
Real Estate	5.2%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.5%	11.3%

Return for Risk

DTD vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTD

DTD Risk / Return Rank: 78
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 80

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTD vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DTD	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.94	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.57	3.83	-0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.52	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.71	4.17	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.39	15.91	-0.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DTD vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTD Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTD and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DTD	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	2.94	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.83	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76	0.67	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.54	0.00

Drawdowns

DTD vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, which is greater than FNDF's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTD	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.19%	-40.14%	-18.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.30%	-10.60%	+4.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.41%	-13.89%	-0.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.14%	-25.56%	+9.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.29%	-40.14%	+2.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.87%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.34%	-7.64%	+0.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	2.77%	-1.25%

Volatility

DTD vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.16%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTD	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.16%	5.10%	-2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.01%	12.53%	-5.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.31%	15.04%	-5.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.57%	16.18%	-2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.21%	17.67%	-1.46%

DTD vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTD vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DTD WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund	1.86%	1.99%	2.07%	2.43%	2.62%	2.04%	2.73%	2.50%	2.93%	2.36%	2.66%	2.81%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTD and FNDF in my portfolio?

DTD and FNDF have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTD or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to DTD (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, DTD or FNDF?

On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.21% vs 11.80% for FNDF. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DTD or FNDF?

Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.21% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DTD or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for DTD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DTD or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 1.86% for DTD.

What is the main difference between DTD and FNDF?

DTD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while FNDF tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.