PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DTD vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DTD vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTD achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DTD has outperformed FDL with an annualized return of 12.18%, while FDL has yielded a comparatively lower 11.24% annualized return.


DTD

1D
-0.48%
1M
2.79%
YTD
10.02%
6M
9.93%
1Y
21.95%
3Y*
17.94%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
12.18%

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTD vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
10.02%14.25%18.56%10.63%-3.83%26.26%2.45%28.19%-6.47%17.35%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DTD and FDL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2006

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between DTD and FDL has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DTD vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DTD
FDL

Financial Services

18.8%
15.1%

Technology

18.5%
1.1%

Healthcare

11.5%
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
14.7%

Industrials

8.6%
3.8%

Energy

8.4%
27.3%

Communication Services

7.4%
10.6%

Utilities

5.9%
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.6%
3.8%

Real Estate

5.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%
0.3%

Financial Services

DTD
18.8%
FDL
15.1%

Technology

DTD
18.5%
FDL
1.1%

Healthcare

DTD
11.5%
FDL
16.8%

Consumer Defensive

DTD
8.7%
FDL
14.7%

Industrials

DTD
8.6%
FDL
3.8%

Energy

DTD
8.4%
FDL
27.3%

Communication Services

DTD
7.4%
FDL
10.6%

Utilities

DTD
5.9%
FDL
6.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DTD
5.6%
FDL
3.8%

Real Estate

DTD
5.2%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

DTD
1.5%
FDL
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DTD vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTD
DTD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
DTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTD vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DTDFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.50

5.56

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.51

13.56

+0.95

DTD vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTD Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTD and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DTDFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.11

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.88

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.66

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.45

+0.08

Drawdowns

DTD vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTD drawdown since its inception was -58.19%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTD and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DTDFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.19%

-65.93%

+7.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.30%

-4.27%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.41%

-12.24%

-2.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-16.46%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.29%

-41.40%

+4.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-2.18%

+1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-9.66%

+2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

1.75%

-0.23%

Volatility

DTD vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund (DTD) is 2.13%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that DTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DTDFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.13%

2.85%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.98%

7.87%

-0.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.29%

11.28%

-1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.57%

14.31%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

17.11%

-0.90%

DTD vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTD has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DTD vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

DTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DTD
WisdomTree U.S. Total Dividend Fund
1.87%1.99%2.07%2.43%2.62%2.04%2.73%2.50%2.93%2.36%2.66%2.81%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


DTD and FDL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to DTD (2.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTD dropped -58.19% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, DTD leads with 12.18% vs 11.24% for FDL. On fees, DTD is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, DTD has been the lower-risk option at 2.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DTD has performed better with a 12.18% return vs 11.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DTD is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDL.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.87% for DTD.

DTD tracks WisdomTree U.S. Dividend Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for DTD and 0.45% for FDL.

DTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DTD and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer