DTAN vs. RBIL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DTAN (Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DTAN is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Sparkline Capital, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. DTAN is actively managed, while RBIL is passively managed. Over the past year, DTAN returned 16.80% vs 3.95% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.21, they often move in opposite directions. DTAN charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

DTAN vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DTAN achieves a 1.93% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.31% return.

DTAN

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: -2.59%
• YTD: 1.93%
• 6M: 1.74%
• 1Y: 16.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RBIL

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.20%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.35%
• 1Y: 3.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DTAN vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DTAN Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF	1.93%	18.90%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.31%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DTAN and RBIL is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.21

Return for Risk

DTAN vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DTAN

DTAN Risk / Return Rank: 30
DTAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DTAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DTAN Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DTAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DTAN Martin Ratio Rank: 31

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DTAN vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DTAN	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	4.18	-3.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	6.39	-4.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.06	-0.87
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	7.59	-6.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	44.07	-39.73

DTAN vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DTAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DTAN and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DTAN vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DTAN drawdown since its inception was -17.58%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DTAN and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	DTAN	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.58%	-0.52%	-17.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.32%	-0.52%	-12.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.17%	-0.51%	-4.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.94%	-0.07%	-2.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.87%	0.09%	+3.78%

Volatility

DTAN vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF (DTAN) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that DTAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DTAN	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.59%	0.36%	+4.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.29%	0.85%	+11.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.63%	0.95%	+14.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.61%	1.07%	+16.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.61%	1.07%	+16.54%

DTAN vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DTAN has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

DTAN vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

DTAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than RBIL's 4.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DTAN Sparkline International Intangible Value ETF	1.72%	1.58%	0.67%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.38%	3.65%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DTAN and RBIL in my portfolio?

DTAN and RBIL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DTAN or RBIL?

DTAN has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DTAN dropped -17.58% vs RBIL's -0.52%.

Which ETF is better, DTAN or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, DTAN leads with 16.80% vs 3.95% for RBIL. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DTAN or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, DTAN has performed better with a 16.80% return vs 3.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DTAN or RBIL?

RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for DTAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DTAN or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 1.72% for DTAN.

What is the main difference between DTAN and RBIL?

DTAN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for DTAN and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.18 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.