DSPY vs. USL
DSPY (Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - DSPY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. DSPY is actively managed, while USL is passively managed. Over the past year, DSPY returned 26.81% vs 57.86% for USL. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. DSPY charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
DSPY vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSPY achieves a 12.26% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
DSPY
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 5.59%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 6M
- 12.63%
- 1Y
- 26.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
DSPY vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy | 12.26% | 18.46% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -12.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DSPY and USL is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025 | -0.15 |
The correlation between DSPY and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DSPY vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DSPY
USL
Technology
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
DSPY
USL
-
Financial Services
DSPY
USL
Industrials
DSPY
USL
-
Healthcare
DSPY
USL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DSPY
USL
-
Communication Services
DSPY
USL
-
Consumer Defensive
DSPY
USL
-
Energy
DSPY
USL
-
Utilities
DSPY
USL
-
Real Estate
DSPY
USL
-
Basic Materials
DSPY
USL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DSPY vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
DSPY
USL
DSPY vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSPY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.34 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.57 | 3.47 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.34 | 7.02 | +9.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSPY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 2.04 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 0.01 | +1.67 |
Drawdowns
DSPY vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSPY drawdown since its inception was -12.15%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSPY and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSPY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.15% | -89.06% | +76.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -16.76% | +9.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -38.16% | +37.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -61.46% | +60.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 8.27% | -6.63% |
Volatility
DSPY vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy (DSPY) is 2.82%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that DSPY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DSPY | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.82% | 10.53% | -7.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.52% | 23.33% | -14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.21% | 28.54% | -17.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 30.08% | -13.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.53% | 32.35% | -15.82% |
DSPY vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSPY has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
DSPY vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
DSPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DSPY Tema S&P 500 Historical Weight ETF Strategy | 0.74% | 0.72% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DSPY and USL have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USL has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to DSPY (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSPY dropped -12.15% vs USL's -89.06%.
On 1-year performance, USL leads with 57.86% vs 26.81% for DSPY. On fees, DSPY is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, DSPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USL has performed better with a 57.86% return vs 26.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DSPY is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
DSPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
DSPY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while USL is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Tema and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for DSPY and 0.88% for USL.
DSPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DSPY and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer