PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DSMC vs. OMFS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DSMC vs. OMFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DSMC vs. OMFS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DSMC
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF
5.80%2.73%2.81%29.50%8.68%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
2.13%13.34%3.98%15.12%3.93%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSMC achieves a 5.80% return, which is significantly higher than OMFS's 2.13% return.


DSMC

1D
1.08%
1M
-0.69%
YTD
5.80%
6M
5.03%
1Y
20.16%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
10Y*

OMFS

1D
2.76%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
2.13%
6M
3.49%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
10.33%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DSMC vs. OMFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSMC has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than OMFS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DSMC vs. OMFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSMC
DSMC Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
DSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
DSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
DSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

OMFS
OMFS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
OMFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMFS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
OMFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMFS Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSMC vs. OMFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) and Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DSMCOMFSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.96

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.48

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.19

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

1.80

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.73

6.67

-1.94

DSMC vs. OMFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSMC Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is comparable to the OMFS Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSMC and OMFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DSMCOMFSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.96

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.36

+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between DSMC and OMFS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

DSMC vs. OMFS - Dividend Comparison

DSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than OMFS's 1.02% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DSMC
Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF
1.20%1.18%1.31%1.02%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OMFS
Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
1.02%0.80%1.87%1.27%1.84%0.66%1.07%1.29%1.50%0.34%

Drawdowns

DSMC vs. OMFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSMC drawdown since its inception was -28.62%, smaller than the maximum OMFS drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSMC and OMFS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DSMCOMFSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.62%

-42.50%

+13.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.50%

-12.23%

-3.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.70%

-6.39%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.23%

-10.68%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.29%

+0.92%

Volatility

DSMC vs. OMFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Distillate Small/Mid Cash Flow ETF (DSMC) is 4.09%, while Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFS) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that DSMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DSMCOMFSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.09%

6.48%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.06%

13.57%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.31%

21.35%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

21.61%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.70%

24.45%

-3.75%