DSI vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DSI (iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. DSI is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, DSI returned 12.35%/yr vs -1.97%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

DSI vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DSI achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -2.72% return.

DSI

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -1.32%
• YTD: 8.47%
• 6M: 7.30%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: 20.37%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: 15.50%

CCOR

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -0.73%
• YTD: -2.72%
• 6M: -2.94%
• 1Y: -3.86%
• 3Y*: -1.69%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DSI vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF	8.47%	18.03%	22.38%	28.51%	-21.71%	31.32%	20.94%	31.15%	-3.90%	12.38%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-2.72%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	4.07%	6.03%	4.64%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between DSI and CCOR is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.21

Over the past year, the correlation between DSI and CCOR has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.21, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DSI vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DSI	CCOR
Technology	43.1%	15.6%
Communication Services	12.8%	8.3%
Financial Services	10.1%	18.2%
Industrials	8.0%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	8.8%
Healthcare	7.0%	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	7.0%
Real Estate	2.6%	2.8%
Basic Materials	2.2%	4.9%
Energy	1.5%	7.9%
Utilities	0.9%	6.2%

Return for Risk

DSI vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DSI

DSI Risk / Return Rank: 54
DSI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DSI Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
DSI Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DSI Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
DSI Martin Ratio Rank: 55

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DSI vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DSI	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	-0.51	+2.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	-0.66	+3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.92	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.25	-0.44	+2.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.27	-0.94	+10.21

DSI vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DSI Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DSI and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DSI vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DSI drawdown since its inception was -54.23%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSI and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DSI	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.23%	-22.99%	-31.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-8.79%	-2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.58%	-12.31%	-8.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.36%	-22.99%	-5.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.10%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.50%	-19.21%	+15.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-7.35%	-0.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	4.10%	-1.42%

Volatility

DSI vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF (DSI) has a higher volatility of 5.59% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 3.51%. This indicates that DSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DSI	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	3.51%	+2.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.08%	5.62%	+5.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.79%	7.56%	+6.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.04%	11.15%	+6.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.73%	10.77%	+7.96%

DSI vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DSI vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

DSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than CCOR's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.02%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%
DSI iShares MSCI KLD 400 Social ETF	0.89%	0.92%	1.03%	1.19%	1.39%	0.99%	1.22%	1.40%	1.63%	1.28%	1.51%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DSI and CCOR in my portfolio?

DSI and CCOR have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DSI or CCOR?

DSI has higher volatility (5.59%) compared to CCOR (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DSI dropped -54.23% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, DSI or CCOR?

On 5-year performance, DSI leads with 12.35% vs -1.97% for CCOR. On fees, DSI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DSI or CCOR?

Over the 5-year period, DSI has performed better with a 12.35% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DSI or CCOR?

DSI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DSI or CCOR?

CCOR has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.89% for DSI.

What is the main difference between DSI and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for DSI and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.