DSHGX vs. IWY
Compare and contrast key facts about DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY).
DSHGX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 13, 2011. IWY is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell Top 200 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2009.
Performance
DSHGX vs. IWY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DSHGX vs. IWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 0.68% | 21.42% | 15.89% | 20.19% | -12.91% | 21.69% | 11.96% | 25.05% | -11.70% | 20.69% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | -9.30% | 18.19% | 34.89% | 46.49% | -29.91% | 31.05% | 39.01% | 36.20% | -0.72% | 31.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DSHGX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than IWY's -9.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DSHGX has underperformed IWY with an annualized return of 11.73%, while IWY has yielded a comparatively higher 17.59% annualized return.
DSHGX
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 4.21%
- 1Y
- 23.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
IWY
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- -4.60%
- YTD
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -8.67%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 13.61%
- 10Y*
- 17.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DSHGX vs. IWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DSHGX has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than IWY's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DSHGX vs. IWY — Risk / Return Rank
DSHGX
IWY
DSHGX vs. IWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX) and iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DSHGX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.53 | 0.84 | +0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.16 | 1.35 | +0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 1.17 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.11 | 3.89 | +4.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DSHGX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.53 | 0.84 | +0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.84 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.87 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DSHGX and IWY is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DSHGX vs. IWY - Dividend Comparison
DSHGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than IWY's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DSHGX DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio | 3.17% | 3.20% | 5.56% | 6.18% | 9.61% | 6.56% | 2.10% | 2.50% | 4.62% | 1.11% | 3.07% | 3.04% |
IWY iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.36% | 0.42% | 0.68% | 0.88% | 0.50% | 0.71% | 1.06% | 1.32% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
DSHGX vs. IWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DSHGX drawdown since its inception was -36.15%, which is greater than IWY's maximum drawdown of -32.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DSHGX and IWY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DSHGX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.15% | -32.68% | -3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -16.63% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.82% | -32.68% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.15% | -32.68% | -3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.58% | -12.77% | +6.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -4.77% | +0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 4.99% | -2.31% |
Volatility
DSHGX vs. IWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Equity Portfolio (DSHGX) is 5.56%, while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a volatility of 6.70%. This indicates that DSHGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DSHGX | IWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.56% | 6.70% | -1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.71% | 12.40% | -3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 22.29% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 21.49% | -6.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 20.92% | -4.87% |