DRV vs. TMF
DRV (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X) are both exchange-traded funds - DRV is a REIT fund tracking the MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRV returned -28.87%/yr vs -16.47%/yr for TMF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRV charges 1.08%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for TMF.
Performance
DRV vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRV achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DRV has underperformed TMF with an annualized return of -28.87%, while TMF has yielded a comparatively higher -16.47% annualized return.
DRV
- 1D
- -1.47%
- 1M
- 6.20%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 6M
- -18.87%
- 1Y
- -16.17%
- 3Y*
- -22.75%
- 5Y*
- -15.22%
- 10Y*
- -28.87%
TMF
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- -10.01%
- 1Y
- 1.66%
- 3Y*
- -20.47%
- 5Y*
- -29.85%
- 10Y*
- -16.47%
DRV vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | -21.02% | -7.27% | -10.50% | -33.74% | 68.51% | -68.77% | -60.48% | -51.70% | 5.07% | -17.10% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | -5.05% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRV and TMF is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2009 | 0.01 |
The correlation between DRV and TMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.38 (3 years) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRV vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
DRV
TMF
DRV vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) and Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRV | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | 0.06 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.35 | 0.29 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.03 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.53 | -0.04 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.19 | -0.08 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRV | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.40 | 0.06 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.27 | -0.64 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.46 | -0.38 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | -0.13 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
DRV vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRV drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TMF's maximum drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRV and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRV | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -92.89% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.02% | -26.51% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -70.74% | -56.31% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.26% | -88.81% | +15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -97.31% | -92.89% | -4.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -92.14% | -7.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.77% | -43.62% | -54.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.45% | 11.42% | +2.03% |
Volatility
DRV vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares (DRV) has a higher volatility of 11.56% compared to Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X (TMF) at 8.30%. This indicates that DRV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRV | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.56% | 8.30% | +3.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.11% | 19.33% | +9.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.37% | 28.86% | +11.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 56.91% | 46.75% | +10.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.67% | 43.92% | +18.75% |
DRV vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRV has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRV vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
DRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, less than TMF's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRV Direxion Daily Real Estate Bear 3x Shares | 3.55% | 2.88% | 4.57% | 5.35% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 1.71% | 0.42% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20-Year Treasury Bull 3X | 4.11% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRV and TMF have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRV has higher volatility (11.56%) compared to TMF (8.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRV dropped -99.99% vs TMF's -92.89%.
On 10-year performance, TMF leads with -16.47% vs -28.87% for DRV. On fees, DRV is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TMF has performed better with a -16.47% return vs -28.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRV is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for TMF.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 3.55% for DRV.
DRV is categorized as REIT, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. DRV tracks MSCI US REIT Index (-300%), while TMF tracks NYSE 20 Year Plus Treasury Bond Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.08% for DRV and 1.09% for TMF.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRV and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer