PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRS vs. PRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DRS vs. PRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRS achieves a 42.93% return, which is significantly higher than PRDO's 17.13% return.


DRS

1D
-2.33%
1M
14.43%
YTD
42.93%
6M
41.39%
1Y
8.10%
3Y*
42.32%
5Y*
10Y*

PRDO

1D
-3.60%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
17.13%
6M
18.99%
1Y
8.84%
3Y*
42.27%
5Y*
23.24%
10Y*
20.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRS vs. PRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
42.93%6.56%61.23%56.81%10.65%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
17.13%12.94%54.04%27.99%-2.25%

Correlation

The correlation between DRS and PRDO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2022

0.20

The correlation between DRS and PRDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DRS:

$1.44

PRDO:

$2.61

PE Ratio

DRS:

33.74

PRDO:

13.07

PEG Ratio

DRS:

2.00

PRDO:

0.90

PS Ratio

DRS:

2.65

PRDO:

2.60

Total Revenue (TTM)

DRS:

$3.70B

PRDO:

$854.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

DRS:

$894.00M

PRDO:

$442.47M

EBITDA (TTM)

DRS:

$433.00M

PRDO:

$269.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRS vs. PRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRS
DRS Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
DRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
DRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRS Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

PRDO
PRDO Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRS vs. PRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) and Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRSPRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.08

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.33

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

0.72

-0.21

DRS vs. PRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRS Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the PRDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRS and PRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRS vs. PRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRS drawdown since its inception was -32.48%, smaller than the maximum PRDO drawdown of -97.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRS and PRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRSPRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.48%

-97.10%

+64.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.48%

-27.22%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.48%

-27.22%

-5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-48.70%

+46.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-60.36%

+53.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

12.35%

+3.70%

Volatility

DRS vs. PRDO - Volatility Comparison

Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock (DRS) has a higher volatility of 13.57% compared to Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) at 8.06%. This indicates that DRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRSPRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.57%

8.06%

+5.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.84%

21.38%

+10.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.60%

30.80%

+9.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.73%

35.19%

+3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

38.11%

+0.62%

Dividends

DRS vs. PRDO - Dividend Comparison

DRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than PRDO's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DRS
Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock
0.74%1.06%0.00%0.00%
PRDO
Perdoceo Education Corporation
1.76%1.91%1.81%1.25%

Financials

DRS vs. PRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Perdoceo Education Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
846.00M
221.74M
(DRS) Total Revenue
(PRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DRS vs. PRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock and Perdoceo Education Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
0
Portfolio components
DRS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 212.00M and revenue of 846.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

PRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 221.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

DRS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 77.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.1%.

PRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported an operating income of 63.12M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 28.5%.

DRS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leonardo DRS Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 62.00M and revenue of 846.00M, resulting in a net margin of 7.3%.

PRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Perdoceo Education Corporation reported a net income of 53.95M and revenue of 221.74M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DRS and PRDO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRS has higher volatility (13.57%) compared to PRDO (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRS dropped -32.48% vs PRDO's -97.10%.

PRDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.29 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRS and PRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer