PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRNZ vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRNZ achieves a 27.64% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 87.83% return.


DRNZ

1D
2.30%
1M
9.00%
YTD
27.64%
6M
32.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
-1.95%
1M
-8.81%
YTD
87.83%
6M
63.25%
1Y
112.38%
3Y*
5.95%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DRNZ
REX Drone ETF
27.64%-10.89%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
87.83%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between DRNZ and WTIU is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRNZ vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRNZ

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX Drone ETF (DRNZ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRNZWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

-0.10

+0.58

Drawdowns

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRNZ drawdown since its inception was -24.52%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRNZ and WTIU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRNZWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.52%

-75.73%

+51.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.32%

-33.42%

+28.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.08%

-39.18%

+28.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.92%

Volatility

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRNZWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.73%

67.43%

-16.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.73%

70.58%

-19.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.73%

70.58%

-19.85%

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRNZ has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRNZ vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither DRNZ nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


DRNZ and WTIU have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRNZ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRNZ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTIU.

DRNZ and WTIU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

DRNZ is categorized as Aerospace & Defense, while WTIU is Leveraged Equities. DRNZ tracks VettaFi Drone Index, while WTIU tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRNZ and 0.95% for WTIU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRNZ and WTIU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer