DRIWX vs. PLTZX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DRIWX (Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, DRIWX returned 6.47%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for PLTZX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DRIWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for PLTZX.

Performance

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIWX achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZX's 8.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIWX has underperformed PLTZX with an annualized return of 6.47%, while PLTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.66% annualized return.

DRIWX

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: 1.44%
• YTD: 5.04%
• 6M: 5.13%
• 1Y: 12.47%
• 3Y*: 7.47%
• 5Y*: 2.27%
• 10Y*: 6.47%

PLTZX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 8.85%
• 1Y: 22.20%
• 3Y*: 17.36%
• 5Y*: 9.41%
• 10Y*: 11.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRIWX Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	5.04%	9.89%	5.12%	10.05%	-22.34%	13.46%	18.33%	21.04%	-7.35%	15.68%
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	8.98%	17.76%	16.89%	20.36%	-18.81%	18.12%	16.60%	27.54%	-9.24%	22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIWX and PLTZX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.75

The correlation between DRIWX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRIWX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIWX

DRIWX Risk / Return Rank: 42
DRIWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
DRIWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
DRIWX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
DRIWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
DRIWX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

PLTZX

PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 46
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIWX	PLTZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	1.75	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	2.46	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.32	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.52	-0.33
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.41	11.06	-2.66

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIWX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIWX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIWX and PLTZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIWX	PLTZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.45%	-34.01%	+6.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-8.70%	+2.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.68%	-15.73%	+5.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.45%	-26.79%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.45%	-34.01%	+6.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-0.63%	+0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.33%	-4.61%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.49%	1.98%	-0.49%

Volatility

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) is 2.58%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 4.90%. This indicates that DRIWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIWX	PLTZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.58%	4.90%	-2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.56%	10.34%	-4.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.08%	12.49%	-5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.66%	15.57%	-4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.11%	16.04%	-5.93%

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DRIWX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

DRIWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, less than PLTZX's 7.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRIWX Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	6.64%	6.89%	6.04%	4.10%	6.63%	5.81%	3.93%	2.39%	2.45%	1.33%	1.40%	0.00%
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	7.65%	8.33%	7.85%	4.12%	8.44%	5.29%	3.60%	5.86%	5.75%	2.73%	3.48%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIWX and PLTZX in my portfolio?

DRIWX and PLTZX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIWX or PLTZX?

PLTZX has higher volatility (4.90%) compared to DRIWX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIWX dropped -27.45% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.