PLTZX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PLTZX (Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - PLTZX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, PLTZX returned 9.32%/yr vs 16.03%/yr for FSPGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PLTZX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTZX achieves a 9.67% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 8.60% return.

PLTZX

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 4.72%
• YTD: 9.67%
• 6M: 10.04%
• 1Y: 22.84%
• 3Y*: 18.70%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

FSPGX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 7.10%
• YTD: 8.60%
• 6M: 7.98%
• 1Y: 27.43%
• 3Y*: 25.53%
• 5Y*: 16.03%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	9.67%	17.76%	16.89%	20.36%	-18.81%	18.12%	16.60%	27.54%	-9.24%	21.86%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	8.60%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTZX and FSPGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017	0.87

The correlation between PLTZX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PLTZX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTZX

PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 49
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 61

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 32
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PLTZX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	1.85	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	2.50	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.32	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.68	1.76	+0.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.08	5.90	+6.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTZX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PLTZX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	1.85	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.75	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.90	-0.19

Drawdowns

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTZX drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTZX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTZX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.01%	-32.66%	-1.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.70%	-16.17%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.73%	-23.32%	+7.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.79%	-32.66%	+5.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.01%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.63%	-6.37%	+1.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	4.81%	-2.88%

Volatility

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 3.30% and 3.32%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTZX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.30%	3.32%	-0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.44%	11.58%	-2.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	15.39%	-3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.46%	21.49%	-6.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	21.55%	-5.56%

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTZX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

PLTZX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PLTZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.60%, more than FSPGX's 0.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.32%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
PLTZX Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund	7.60%	8.33%	7.85%	4.12%	8.44%	5.29%	3.60%	5.86%	5.75%	2.73%	3.48%	3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTZX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

PLTZX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PLTZX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PLTZX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTZX dropped -34.01% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.