PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIWX vs. VSCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIWX achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly lower than VSCGX's 5.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with DRIWX having a 6.47% annualized return and VSCGX not far ahead at 6.63%.


DRIWX

1D
0.63%
1M
1.44%
YTD
5.04%
6M
5.13%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
6.47%

VSCGX

1D
0.61%
1M
1.28%
YTD
5.55%
6M
5.64%
1Y
14.19%
3Y*
11.91%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
5.04%9.89%5.12%10.05%-22.34%13.46%18.33%21.04%-7.35%15.68%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund
5.55%12.87%11.65%12.72%-15.00%6.04%11.51%15.69%-2.95%10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIWX and VSCGX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.87

The correlation between DRIWX and VSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIWX vs. VSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIWX
DRIWX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DRIWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIWX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

VSCGX
VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIWXVSCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

2.70

-0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.41

11.61

-3.20

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the VSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIWX and VSCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIWX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, smaller than the maximum VSCGX drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIWX and VSCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIWXVSCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.45%

-30.62%

+3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-5.19%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.68%

-6.71%

-3.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.45%

-20.15%

-7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.45%

-20.15%

-7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.09%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.33%

-2.99%

-3.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

1.21%

+0.28%

Volatility

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX) have volatilities of 2.58% and 2.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIWXVSCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

2.67%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.56%

5.54%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.08%

6.53%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.66%

7.76%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.11%

7.40%

+2.71%

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCGX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Dividend Comparison

DRIWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.64%, more than VSCGX's 5.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIWX
Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
6.64%6.89%6.04%4.10%6.63%5.81%3.93%2.39%2.45%1.33%1.40%0.00%
VSCGX
Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund
5.25%5.50%11.03%5.23%2.79%4.18%3.28%2.62%3.81%1.65%2.43%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIWX and VSCGX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to DRIWX (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIWX dropped -27.45% vs VSCGX's -30.62%.

VSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIWX and VSCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer