DRIWX vs. VSCGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

DRIWX (Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund) and VSCGX (Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund) are both mutual funds - DRIWX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Dimensional, while VSCGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 10 years, DRIWX returned 5.81%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for VSCGX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DRIWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VSCGX.

Performance

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIWX achieves a 2.69% return, which is significantly lower than VSCGX's 4.33% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIWX has underperformed VSCGX with an annualized return of 5.81%, while VSCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.

DRIWX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: -1.53%
• 6M: 1.52%
• YTD: 2.69%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: 6.27%
• 5Y*: 1.07%
• 10Y*: 5.81%
• ALL TIME*: 6.40%

VSCGX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -0.66%
• 6M: 2.82%
• YTD: 4.33%
• 1Y: 10.37%
• 3Y*: 10.94%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: 6.24%
• ALL TIME*: 6.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DRIWX Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRIWX Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	2.69%	9.89%	5.12%	10.05%	-22.34%	13.46%	18.33%	21.04%	-7.35%	15.68%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund	4.33%	12.87%	11.65%	12.72%	-15.00%	6.04%	11.51%	15.69%	-2.95%	10.02%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIWX and VSCGX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.87

The correlation between DRIWX and VSCGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRIWX vs. VSCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DRIWX

DRIWX Risk / Return Rank: 30
DRIWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
DRIWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
DRIWX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
DRIWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
DRIWX Martin Ratio Rank: 31

VSCGX

VSCGX Risk / Return Rank: 64
VSCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
VSCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
VSCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
VSCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
VSCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) and Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIWX	VSCGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	1.49	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.15	-0.68
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.28	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.26	1.94	-0.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	8.03	-3.47

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VSCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIWX and VSCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIWX drawdown since its inception was -27.45%, smaller than the maximum VSCGX drawdown of -30.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIWX and VSCGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIWX	VSCGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.45%	-30.62%	+3.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.75%	-5.19%	-0.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.07%	-6.17%	-2.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.45%	-20.15%	-7.30%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.45%	-20.15%	-7.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.47%	-1.25%	-1.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-2.99%	-3.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	1.25%	+0.34%

Volatility

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIWX) is 1.88%, while Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund (VSCGX) has a volatility of 2.06%. This indicates that DRIWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VSCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIWX	VSCGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.88%	2.06%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.71%	5.77%	-0.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.18%	6.75%	+0.43%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.67%	7.81%	+2.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.06%	7.40%	+2.66%

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VSCGX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DRIWX vs. VSCGX - Dividend Comparison

DRIWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.48%, more than VSCGX's 5.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRIWX Dimensional 2030 Target Date Retirement Income Fund	7.48%	6.89%	6.04%	4.10%	6.63%	5.81%	3.93%	2.39%	2.45%	1.33%	1.40%	0.00%
VSCGX Vanguard LifeStrategy 40/60 Fund	5.33%	5.50%	11.03%	5.23%	2.79%	4.18%	3.28%	2.62%	3.81%	1.65%	2.43%	3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIWX and VSCGX in my portfolio?

DRIWX and VSCGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIWX or VSCGX?

VSCGX has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to DRIWX (1.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIWX dropped -27.45% vs VSCGX's -30.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.