PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIV vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIV vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DRIV having a 13.45% return and HERD slightly lower at 13.14%.


DRIV

1D
0.14%
1M
-9.42%
6M
2.21%
YTD
13.45%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.52%

HERD

1D
1.41%
1M
3.81%
6M
8.66%
YTD
13.14%
1Y
22.25%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
10.33%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.00M$1.79M$2.96M
$163.67K$196.36K$206.62K

DRIV vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
13.45%30.42%-5.04%26.14%-34.13%27.80%62.76%7.21%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
13.14%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and HERD is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.62

The correlation between DRIV and HERD shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DRIV vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DRIV
HERD

Technology

40.9%
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

23.8%
17.8%

Industrials

17.5%
11.9%

Basic Materials

11.5%
6.2%

Communication Services

6.3%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

10.1%

Energy

-

10.4%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Healthcare

-

16.9%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Utilities

-

1.3%

Technology

DRIV
40.9%
HERD
16.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DRIV
23.8%
HERD
17.8%

Industrials

DRIV
17.5%
HERD
11.9%

Basic Materials

DRIV
11.5%
HERD
6.2%

Communication Services

DRIV
6.3%
HERD
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

DRIV

-

HERD
10.1%

Energy

DRIV

-

HERD
10.4%

Financial Services

DRIV

-

HERD
0.0%

Healthcare

DRIV

-

HERD
16.9%

Real Estate

DRIV

-

HERD
0.4%

Utilities

DRIV

-

HERD
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIV vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIVHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

3.94

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

11.90

-6.50

DRIV vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIV and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than HERD's maximum drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIVHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-39.41%

-2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.20%

-5.68%

-15.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

-18.90%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

-21.60%

-20.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.09%

0.00%

-21.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-4.51%

-10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

1.90%

+4.43%

Volatility

DRIV vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a higher volatility of 10.11% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 3.39%. This indicates that DRIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIVHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

3.39%

+6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.16%

8.56%

+15.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

11.77%

+17.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

17.66%

+10.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.71%

20.37%

+7.34%

DRIV vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIV vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than HERD's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
0.65%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.77%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIV and HERD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIV has higher volatility (10.11%) compared to HERD (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIV dropped -41.93% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.33% vs 4.90% for DRIV. On fees, DRIV is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.33% return vs 4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRIV is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.65% for DRIV.

DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIV and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer