PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRIV vs. BDVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRIV vs. BDVL

Last updated Jul 28, 2026
Documentation

DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) and BDVL (iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF) are both Global Equities funds - DRIV tracks the Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index while BDVL tracks the MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRIV charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BDVL.

Performance

DRIV vs. BDVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIV achieves a 13.45% return, which is significantly higher than BDVL's 5.92% return.

DRIV

1D
0.14%
1M
-9.42%
6M
2.21%
YTD
13.45%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
4.90%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
11.52%

BDVL

1D
0.62%
1M
1.28%
6M
3.79%
YTD
5.92%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BDVL

iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF
$6.05M$5.39M$7.19M

DRIV

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF
$1.00M$1.79M$2.96M

DRIV vs. BDVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF		13.45%12.86%
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF		5.92%2.20%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIV and BDVL is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2025

0.66

DRIV vs. BDVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DRIV
BDVL

Technology

40.9%
26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

23.8%
9.2%

Industrials

17.5%
15.9%

Basic Materials

11.5%
3.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.3%

Energy

-

2.2%

Financial Services

-

13.5%

Healthcare

-

10.5%

Real Estate

-

1.1%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Technology

DRIV
40.9%
BDVL
26.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DRIV
23.8%
BDVL
9.2%

Industrials

DRIV
17.5%
BDVL
15.9%

Basic Materials

DRIV
11.5%
BDVL
3.0%

Communication Services

DRIV
6.3%
BDVL
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

DRIV

-

BDVL
5.3%

Energy

DRIV

-

BDVL
2.2%

Financial Services

DRIV

-

BDVL
13.5%

Healthcare

DRIV

-

BDVL
10.5%

Real Estate

DRIV

-

BDVL
1.1%

Utilities

DRIV

-

BDVL
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF

iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF

Often compared with DRIV:
DRIV vs. IDRVDRIV vs. KARSDRIV vs. LITDRIV vs. QCLNDRIV vs. WCLDDRIV vs. VOODRIV vs. TAN
Often compared with BDVL:
BDVL vs. CGGEBDVL vs. UFOBDVL vs. VTBDVL vs. CAPEBDVL vs. IVESBDVL vs. DFAWBDVL vs. PAWZ

Return for Risk

DRIV vs. BDVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
DRIV
DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
BDVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIV vs. BDVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) and iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF (BDVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRIVBDVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.18

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.65

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.40

—

—

DRIV vs. BDVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIV vs. BDVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIV drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, which is greater than BDVL's maximum drawdown of -7.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIV and BDVL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRIVBDVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-7.71%

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.20%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.18%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.93%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.09%

-0.65%

-20.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.08%

-1.15%

-13.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.33%

—

—

Volatility

DRIV vs. BDVL - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRIVBDVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.11%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.16%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.04%

9.47%

+19.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.84%

9.47%

+18.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.71%

9.47%

+18.24%

DRIV vs. BDVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIV has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BDVL's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRIV vs. BDVL - Dividend Comparison

DRIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than BDVL's 3.52% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
BDVL
iShares Disciplined Volatility Equity Active ETF		3.52%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DRIV
Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF		0.65%1.07%2.07%1.62%1.24%0.32%0.29%1.23%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRIV and BDVL have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BDVL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDVL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

BDVL has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.65% for DRIV.

DRIV tracks Solactive Autonomous & Electric Vehicles Index, while BDVL tracks MSCI ACWI Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for DRIV and 0.40% for BDVL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIV and BDVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer