DRIP vs. RSPG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

DRIP (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares) and RSPG (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRIP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%), while RSPG is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DRIP returned -42.27%/yr vs 8.99%/yr for RSPG. At a correlation of -0.94, they often move in opposite directions. DRIP charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPG.

Performance

DRIP vs. RSPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -48.08% return, which is significantly lower than RSPG's 31.15% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIP has underperformed RSPG with an annualized return of -42.27%, while RSPG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.99% annualized return.

DRIP

• 1D: -8.32%
• 1M: -1.64%
• 6M: -46.66%
• YTD: -48.08%
• 1Y: -45.69%
• 3Y*: -27.37%
• 5Y*: -42.71%
• 10Y*: -42.27%

RSPG

• 1D: 2.65%
• 1M: -0.27%
• 6M: 27.78%
• YTD: 31.15%
• 1Y: 35.69%
• 3Y*: 16.66%
• 5Y*: 23.07%
• 10Y*: 8.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIP vs. RSPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares	-48.08%	-14.81%	1.27%	-17.24%	-73.57%	-79.74%	-42.76%	-36.11%	49.62%	-9.05%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	31.15%	7.01%	6.09%	4.49%	57.97%	57.73%	-32.44%	13.38%	-24.68%	-6.39%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIP and RSPG is -0.92, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015	-0.94

The correlation between DRIP and RSPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.95 to -0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DRIP vs. RSPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIP

DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 3
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 3
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3

RSPG

RSPG Risk / Return Rank: 57
RSPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
RSPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSPG Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RSPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RSPG Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIP vs. RSPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRIP	RSPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.81	1.63	-2.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	2.16	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.27	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	2.61	-3.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	6.74	-8.03

DRIP vs. RSPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the RSPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIP and RSPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DRIP vs. RSPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than RSPG's maximum drawdown of -79.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and RSPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRIP	RSPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.95%	-79.98%	-19.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.18%	-13.72%	-48.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.02%	-23.06%	-52.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-96.24%	-28.44%	-67.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.92%	-73.17%	-26.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.94%	-7.86%	-92.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-90.51%	-25.38%	-65.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.50%	5.34%	+30.16%

Volatility

DRIP vs. RSPG - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) has a higher volatility of 17.28% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF (RSPG) at 7.17%. This indicates that DRIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRIP	RSPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.28%	7.17%	+10.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.06%	16.88%	+27.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.84%	22.08%	+34.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.18%	28.15%	+40.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.90%	33.47%	+62.43%

DRIP vs. RSPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPG's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRIP vs. RSPG - Dividend Comparison

DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, more than RSPG's 2.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares	3.42%	2.86%	4.38%	5.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.96%	0.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RSPG Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF	2.02%	2.60%	2.43%	2.84%	3.43%	2.37%	3.15%	2.15%	2.18%	2.55%	1.14%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRIP and RSPG in my portfolio?

DRIP and RSPG have a correlation of -0.92, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DRIP or RSPG?

DRIP has higher volatility (17.28%) compared to RSPG (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIP dropped -99.95% vs RSPG's -79.98%.

Which ETF is better, DRIP or RSPG?

On 10-year performance, RSPG leads with 8.99% vs -42.27% for DRIP. On fees, RSPG is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPG has been the lower-risk option at 7.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DRIP or RSPG?

Over the 10-year period, RSPG has performed better with a 8.99% return vs -42.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRIP or RSPG?

RSPG is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRIP or RSPG?

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 2.02% for RSPG.

What is the main difference between DRIP and RSPG?

DRIP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RSPG is Energy Equities. DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%), while RSPG tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy Plus Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.40% for RSPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.