DRIP vs. NRGD
DRIP (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares) and NRGD (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds - DRIP tracks the S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%) while NRGD tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DRIP returned -45.69% vs -73.89% for NRGD. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DRIP charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for NRGD.
Performance
DRIP vs. NRGD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -48.08% return, which is significantly higher than NRGD's -71.23% return.
DRIP
- 1D
- -8.32%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- 6M
- -46.66%
- YTD
- -48.08%
- 1Y
- -45.69%
- 3Y*
- -27.37%
- 5Y*
- -42.71%
- 10Y*
- -42.27%
NRGD
- 1D
- -12.87%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- 6M
- -67.30%
- YTD
- -71.23%
- 1Y
- -73.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRIP vs. NRGD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | -48.08% | -4.37% |
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -71.23% | -35.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRIP and NRGD is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025 | 0.92 |
The correlation between DRIP and NRGD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRIP vs. NRGD — Risk / Return Rank
DRIP
NRGD
DRIP vs. NRGD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRIP | NRGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.80 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | -0.94 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.48 | +0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRIP vs. NRGD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than NRGD's maximum drawdown of -89.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and NRGD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRIP | NRGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -89.64% | -10.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -62.18% | -78.53% | +16.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -89.44% | -10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -90.51% | -60.82% | -29.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.50% | 49.95% | -14.45% |
Volatility
DRIP vs. NRGD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) is 17.28%, while MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (NRGD) has a volatility of 26.28%. This indicates that DRIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRGD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRIP | NRGD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.28% | 26.28% | -9.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.06% | 60.05% | -15.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 56.84% | 75.76% | -18.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.18% | 88.65% | -20.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.90% | 88.65% | +7.25% |
DRIP vs. NRGD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NRGD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRIP vs. NRGD - Dividend Comparison
DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, while NRGD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRIP Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares | 3.42% | 2.86% | 4.38% | 5.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.96% | 0.58% |
NRGD MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DRIP and NRGD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
NRGD has higher volatility (26.28%) compared to DRIP (17.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIP dropped -99.95% vs NRGD's -89.64%.
On 1-year performance, DRIP leads with -45.69% vs -73.89% for NRGD. On fees, NRGD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DRIP has been the lower-risk option at 17.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DRIP has performed better with a -45.69% return vs -73.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NRGD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.
DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for NRGD.
DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%), while NRGD tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and BMO. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.95% for NRGD.
DRIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.81 vs -0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRIP and NRGD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer