PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRIP vs. GLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRIP vs. GLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRIP achieves a -41.20% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's -1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, DRIP has underperformed GLL with an annualized return of -42.06%, while GLL has yielded a comparatively higher -21.26% annualized return.


DRIP

1D
-0.94%
1M
18.92%
YTD
-41.20%
6M
-40.68%
1Y
-42.23%
3Y*
-27.26%
5Y*
-38.71%
10Y*
-42.06%

GLL

1D
3.82%
1M
18.89%
YTD
-1.30%
6M
7.14%
1Y
-39.64%
3Y*
-39.33%
5Y*
-28.52%
10Y*
-21.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRIP vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
-41.20%-14.81%1.27%-17.24%-73.57%-79.74%-42.76%-36.11%49.62%-9.05%
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
-1.30%-62.81%-33.33%-14.91%-2.12%1.66%-41.47%-26.95%5.39%-23.67%

Correlation

The correlation between DRIP and GLL is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2015

0.04

The correlation between DRIP and GLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.12 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRIP vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRIP
DRIP Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DRIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIP Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIP Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

GLL
GLL Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRIP vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRIPGLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

0.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

0.89

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

-0.61

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

-0.92

-0.33

DRIP vs. GLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is comparable to the GLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRIP and GLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRIP vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRIP drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, roughly equal to the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRIP and GLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRIPGLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.95%

-99.24%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.18%

-65.10%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.02%

-87.95%

+11.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.24%

-89.76%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.92%

-95.76%

-4.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.93%

-98.77%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-90.46%

-85.15%

-5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.75%

43.09%

-9.34%

Volatility

DRIP vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares (DRIP) has a higher volatility of 18.04% compared to ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) at 16.15%. This indicates that DRIP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRIPGLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.04%

16.15%

+1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.68%

46.91%

-3.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

56.75%

54.37%

+2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.37%

36.40%

+31.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.33%

32.31%

+64.02%

DRIP vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRIP has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRIP vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison

DRIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.36%, while GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRIP
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bear 2x Shares
3.36%2.86%4.38%5.09%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.96%0.58%
GLL
ProShares UltraShort Gold
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRIP and GLL have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRIP has higher volatility (18.04%) compared to GLL (16.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRIP dropped -99.95% vs GLL's -99.24%.

On 10-year performance, GLL leads with -21.26% vs -42.06% for DRIP. On fees, GLL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GLL has been the lower-risk option at 16.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLL has performed better with a -21.26% return vs -42.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GLL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for DRIP.

DRIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.36%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.

DRIP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. DRIP tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (-300%), while GLL tracks Bloomberg Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for DRIP and 0.95% for GLL.

GLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.73 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRIP and GLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer