DRGVX vs. PGROX
Compare and contrast key facts about BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX).
DRGVX is an actively managed fund by BNY Mellon. It was launched on May 31, 2001. PGROX is managed by BNY Mellon. It was launched on Jul 14, 1993.
Performance
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 2.32% | 18.48% | 14.26% | 12.83% | 1.51% | 31.14% | 3.94% | 27.04% | -10.52% | 15.06% |
PGROX BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund | -6.54% | 13.46% | 7.88% | 22.40% | -17.75% | 23.85% | 24.43% | 34.92% | -8.66% | 27.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGVX achieves a 2.32% return, which is significantly higher than PGROX's -6.54% return. Over the past 10 years, DRGVX has outperformed PGROX with an annualized return of 12.96%, while PGROX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.17% annualized return.
DRGVX
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 2.32%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 18.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
PGROX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- -6.54%
- 6M
- -5.12%
- 1Y
- 9.20%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGVX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than PGROX's 1.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DRGVX vs. PGROX — Risk / Return Rank
DRGVX
PGROX
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) and BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRGVX | PGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 0.56 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.94 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.13 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.56 | 0.85 | +0.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.92 | 3.20 | +3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRGVX | PGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 0.56 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 | 0.36 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.63 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.54 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGVX and PGROX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Dividend Comparison
DRGVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, less than PGROX's 18.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRGVX BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I | 6.72% | 6.88% | 6.87% | 5.31% | 7.99% | 21.73% | 2.85% | 3.52% | 17.87% | 10.95% | 2.89% | 16.07% |
PGROX BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund | 18.96% | 17.72% | 11.89% | 1.88% | 7.61% | 8.12% | 4.05% | 7.44% | 13.96% | 13.45% | 8.19% | 8.46% |
Drawdowns
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGVX drawdown since its inception was -42.60%, smaller than the maximum PGROX drawdown of -47.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGVX and PGROX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGVX | PGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.60% | -47.75% | +5.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -11.70% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.01% | -26.99% | +9.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.60% | -30.17% | -12.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -8.79% | +4.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -8.50% | +4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.12% | -0.36% |
Volatility
DRGVX vs. PGROX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Dynamic Value Fund Class I (DRGVX) is 4.71%, while BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Fund (PGROX) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that DRGVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGROX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DRGVX | PGROX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.73% | -1.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.13% | 9.69% | -0.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.88% | 17.58% | -0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 17.72% | -2.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.82% | 17.92% | +0.90% |