DRGN vs. KROP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index while KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KROP.

Performance

DRGN vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 15.39% return, which is significantly lower than KROP's 16.59% return.

DRGN

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 4.18%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 15.70%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KROP

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.70%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 12.86%
• 3Y*: 0.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRGN vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	15.39%	26.41%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	16.59%	-3.77%

Correlation

The correlation between DRGN and KROP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

DRGN vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROP

KROP Risk / Return Rank: 23
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 23
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRGN vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRGN	KROP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.52	-0.57	+2.09

Drawdowns

DRGN vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum KROP drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and KROP.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRGN	KROP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.86%	-61.96%	+41.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.29%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-28.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.97%	-48.93%	+40.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.93%	-44.50%	+36.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRGN	KROP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.98%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.79%	16.04%	+18.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.79%	22.27%	+12.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.79%	22.27%	+12.52%

DRGN vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRGN vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF	1.05%	1.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF	2.34%	2.73%	1.89%	1.36%	0.71%	0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRGN and KROP in my portfolio?

DRGN and KROP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRGN or KROP?

On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRGN or KROP?

DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRGN or KROP?

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 1.05% for DRGN.

What is the main difference between DRGN and KROP?

DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.50% for KROP.