DRGN vs. BOTZ
DRGN (Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF) and BOTZ (Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF) are both Artificial Intelligence funds - DRGN tracks the BITA China Generative AI Select Index while BOTZ tracks the Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DRGN returned 37.74% vs 9.71% for BOTZ. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. DRGN charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for BOTZ.
Performance
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRGN achieves a 13.71% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 2.42% return.
DRGN
- 1D
- 4.60%
- 1M
- 4.46%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 37.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 41.66%
BOTZ
- 1D
- 3.23%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 2.42%
- 1Y
- 9.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.77%
- 5Y*
- 1.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $30.70M | $30.05M | $37.12M | |
| $473.92K | $435.90K | $560.91K |
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 13.71% | 26.96% |
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 2.42% | 12.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRGN and BOTZ is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.56 |
The correlation between DRGN and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRGN vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank
DRGN
BOTZ
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRGN | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.08 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | 0.50 | +1.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | 1.27 | +2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRGN drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRGN and BOTZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRGN | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.86% | -55.54% | +34.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.86% | -19.34% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -55.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.32% | -10.86% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.41% | -18.22% | +9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.47% | 7.67% | +2.80% |
Volatility
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison
Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF (DRGN) has a higher volatility of 12.67% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 9.53%. This indicates that DRGN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRGN | BOTZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.67% | 9.53% | +3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.15% | 21.87% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.79% | 26.60% | +10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.16% | 27.33% | +8.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.16% | 25.90% | +10.26% |
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRGN has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRGN vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison
DRGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than BOTZ's 0.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BOTZ Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF | 0.47% | 0.66% | 0.13% | 0.20% | 0.23% | 0.16% | 0.19% | 0.83% | 1.44% | 0.01% | 0.06% |
DRGN Themes China Generative Artificial Intelligence ETF | 1.07% | 1.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRGN and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DRGN has higher volatility (12.67%) compared to BOTZ (9.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRGN dropped -20.86% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.
On 1-year performance, DRGN leads with 37.74% vs 9.71% for BOTZ. On fees, DRGN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 9.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DRGN has performed better with a 37.74% return vs 9.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DRGN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for BOTZ.
DRGN has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.47% for BOTZ.
DRGN tracks BITA China Generative AI Select Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DRGN and 0.68% for BOTZ.
DRGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRGN and BOTZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer