DRES vs. QIDX
DRES (GMO Domestic Resilience ETF) and QIDX (Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
DRES vs. QIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRES achieves a 19.60% return, which is significantly higher than QIDX's 7.83% return.
DRES
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 2.97%
- YTD
- 19.60%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QIDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 1.28%
- YTD
- 7.83%
- 6M
- 6.85%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRES vs. QIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 19.60% | 2.50% |
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 7.83% | -1.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRES and QIDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRES vs. QIDX — Risk / Return Rank
DRES
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QIDX
DRES vs. QIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Domestic Resilience ETF (DRES) and Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF (QIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRES | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.75 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.80 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRES vs. QIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRES drawdown since its inception was -10.41%, smaller than the maximum QIDX drawdown of -14.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRES and QIDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRES | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.41% | -14.99% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -1.29% | -0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.20% | -2.24% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.09% | — |
Volatility
DRES vs. QIDX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRES | QIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 11.15% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 14.54% | +3.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.53% | 14.54% | +3.99% |
DRES vs. QIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRES and QIDX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
DRES vs. QIDX - Dividend Comparison
DRES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than QIDX's 0.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DRES GMO Domestic Resilience ETF | 0.30% | 0.22% |
QIDX Indexperts Quality Earnings Focused ETF | 0.85% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRES and QIDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRES and QIDX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
QIDX has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.30% for DRES.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and Indexperts.
Find the right allocation for DRES and QIDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer