DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L
DRDR.L (iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and RBOD.L (iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRDR.L is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while RBOD.L is a Robotics fund tracking the iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DRDR.L returned -0.91%/yr vs 11.96%/yr for RBOD.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DRDR.L is traded in GBp, while RBOD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RBOD.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRDR.L achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly lower than RBOD.L's 29.61% return.
DRDR.L
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- 6.16%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- 1Y
- 21.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.43%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- —
RBOD.L
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 29.61%
- 6M
- 26.21%
- 1Y
- 47.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.96%
- 10Y*
- —
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.01% | 10.25% | 2.62% | -2.51% | -14.93% | -5.21% | 48.69% | 8.88% | 2.12% | 4.13% |
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 29.61% | 8.75% | 7.69% | 32.69% | -26.69% | 22.05% | 35.59% | 32.48% | -14.37% | 1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRDR.L and RBOD.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2017 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DRDR.L and RBOD.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
Technology
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
Industrials
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
Basic Materials
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
Financial Services
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
-
Consumer Defensive
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
-
Communication Services
DRDR.L
-
RBOD.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
DRDR.L
-
RBOD.L
Energy
DRDR.L
-
RBOD.L
-
Real Estate
DRDR.L
-
RBOD.L
-
Utilities
DRDR.L
-
RBOD.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L — Risk / Return Rank
DRDR.L
RBOD.L
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRDR.L | RBOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.50 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 10.36 | -6.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRDR.L | RBOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 2.18 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.54 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRDR.L drawdown since its inception was -38.49%, which is greater than RBOD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRDR.L and RBOD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRDR.L | RBOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.49% | -33.70% | -4.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.51% | -13.57% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.38% | -27.59% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.81% | -33.70% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.88% | -0.25% | -16.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.17% | -9.29% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 4.59% | +0.39% |
Volatility
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (DRDR.L) is 4.79%, while iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBOD.L) has a volatility of 7.80%. This indicates that DRDR.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBOD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRDR.L | RBOD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.79% | 7.80% | -3.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 17.44% | -5.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.56% | 21.79% | -6.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.52% | 22.12% | -4.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 22.41% | -3.83% |
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DRDR.L and RBOD.L have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
DRDR.L vs. RBOD.L - Dividend Comparison
DRDR.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RBOD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRDR.L iShares Healthcare Innovation UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RBOD.L iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF | 0.27% | 0.34% | 0.36% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.79% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRDR.L and RBOD.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRDR.L and RBOD.L have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
DRDR.L is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while RBOD.L is Robotics. DRDR.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD, while RBOD.L tracks iSTOXX® FactSet Automation & Robotics.
Find the right allocation for DRDR.L and RBOD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer