DRCAX vs. DNLAX
DRCAX (BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund) and DNLAX (BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - DRCAX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by BNY Mellon, while DNLAX is a Energy Equities fund managed by BNY Mellon. Over the past 10 years, DRCAX returned 1.59%/yr vs 14.01%/yr for DNLAX. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. DRCAX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for DNLAX.
Performance
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DRCAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than DNLAX's 27.67% return. Over the past 10 years, DRCAX has underperformed DNLAX with an annualized return of 1.59%, while DNLAX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.01% annualized return.
DRCAX
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 6.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.59%
DNLAX
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 2.80%
- YTD
- 27.67%
- 6M
- 30.04%
- 1Y
- 54.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 16.23%
- 10Y*
- 14.01%
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRCAX BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund | 1.61% | 3.90% | 1.98% | 5.53% | -10.78% | 1.55% | 4.09% | 7.57% | 0.16% | 5.59% |
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 27.67% | 14.75% | 0.86% | 1.33% | 33.83% | 38.00% | 6.30% | 16.33% | -17.78% | 13.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRCAX and DNLAX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2003 | -0.11 |
The correlation between DRCAX and DNLAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (all time) to 0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRCAX vs. DNLAX — Risk / Return Rank
DRCAX
DNLAX
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund (DRCAX) and BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DRCAX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.51 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.37 | 7.45 | -5.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | 23.48 | -15.42 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DRCAX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 3.08 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.64 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.37 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRCAX drawdown since its inception was -18.57%, smaller than the maximum DNLAX drawdown of -69.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCAX and DNLAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRCAX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.57% | -69.14% | +50.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.92% | -7.51% | +4.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.35% | -32.37% | +26.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.74% | -32.37% | +16.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.74% | -54.45% | +38.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | 0.00% | -0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.90% | -21.56% | +18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 2.38% | -1.52% |
Volatility
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund (DRCAX) is 1.08%, while BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A (DNLAX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that DRCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DNLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRCAX | DNLAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.08% | 4.59% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 13.48% | -11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94% | 18.16% | -15.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 25.65% | -21.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.08% | 25.50% | -21.42% |
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRCAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DNLAX's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRCAX vs. DNLAX - Dividend Comparison
DRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than DNLAX's 1.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DNLAX BNY Mellon Natural Resources Fund Class A | 1.72% | 2.19% | 7.75% | 12.54% | 9.80% | 5.04% | 0.91% | 1.95% | 1.53% | 0.40% | 1.26% | 0.98% |
DRCAX BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund | 2.93% | 3.84% | 2.77% | 2.20% | 2.29% | 2.20% | 2.78% | 3.68% | 3.71% | 3.91% | 3.53% | 3.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRCAX and DNLAX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DNLAX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to DRCAX (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRCAX dropped -18.57% vs DNLAX's -69.14%.
DNLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.08 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DRCAX and DNLAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer