PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRCAX vs. DTGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund (DRCAX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRCAX achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than DTGRX's 30.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DRCAX has underperformed DTGRX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while DTGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.79% annualized return.


DRCAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.46%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
1.57%

DTGRX

1D
2.13%
1M
17.36%
YTD
30.05%
6M
30.56%
1Y
61.09%
3Y*
37.14%
5Y*
14.99%
10Y*
22.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DRCAX
BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund
1.46%3.90%1.98%5.53%-10.78%1.55%4.09%7.57%0.16%5.59%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
30.05%27.20%30.78%59.98%-46.44%12.62%69.80%52.82%-1.47%42.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DRCAX and DTGRX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 1997

-0.08

The correlation between DRCAX and DTGRX shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRCAX vs. DTGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRCAX
DRCAX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DRCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DRCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DTGRX
DTGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DTGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DTGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DTGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DTGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
DTGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund (DRCAX) and BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DRCAXDTGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

2.90

-0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.55

-0.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

3.60

-1.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.62

13.05

-5.43

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the DTGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRCAX and DTGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRCAXDTGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.90

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

0.53

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

0.82

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.44

+0.43

Drawdowns

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRCAX drawdown since its inception was -18.57%, smaller than the maximum DTGRX drawdown of -83.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRCAX and DTGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRCAXDTGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.57%

-83.23%

+64.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.92%

-17.27%

+14.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.35%

-28.31%

+21.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.74%

-52.92%

+37.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.74%

-52.92%

+37.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

0.00%

-0.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-38.75%

+35.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

4.76%

-3.90%

Volatility

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund (DRCAX) is 1.07%, while BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund (DTGRX) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that DRCAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DTGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRCAXDTGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

7.07%

-6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.18%

17.14%

-14.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94%

21.74%

-18.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.11%

28.62%

-24.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

27.98%

-23.90%

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRCAX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DTGRX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRCAX vs. DTGRX - Dividend Comparison

DRCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, less than DTGRX's 9.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRCAX
BNY MellonCalifornia AMT-Free Municipal Bond Fund
2.94%3.84%2.77%2.20%2.29%2.20%2.78%3.68%3.71%3.91%3.53%3.52%
DTGRX
BNY Mellon Technology Growth Fund
9.26%12.04%8.98%0.00%0.00%21.32%5.76%34.25%30.17%9.91%10.19%6.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRCAX and DTGRX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DTGRX has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to DRCAX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRCAX dropped -18.57% vs DTGRX's -83.23%.

DTGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRCAX and DTGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer