DRAY vs. QYLD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

DRAY (YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. DRAY is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.

Performance

DRAY vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRAY achieves a -28.25% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 7.88% return.

DRAY

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: -28.25%
• 6M: -29.58%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.40%
• YTD: 7.88%
• 6M: 9.91%
• 1Y: 23.70%
• 3Y*: 13.76%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 9.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAY vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF	-28.25%	-19.23%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	7.88%	11.69%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAY and QYLD is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

DRAY vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QYLD

QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 89
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAY vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAY	QYLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.58	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-1.13	0.59	-1.72

Drawdowns

DRAY vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAY drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than QYLD's maximum drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAY and QYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAY	QYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.87%	-24.75%	-33.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.06%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.61%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.92%	-0.06%	-47.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.42%	-3.84%	-27.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAY	QYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.84%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.12%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.72%	8.57%	+32.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.72%	14.70%	+26.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.72%	15.49%	+25.23%

DRAY vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAY vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

DRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 89.20%, more than QYLD's 11.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRAY YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF	89.20%	32.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF	11.46%	11.55%	12.50%	11.78%	13.75%	12.85%	11.16%	9.84%	12.44%	7.69%	9.15%	9.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRAY and QYLD in my portfolio?

DRAY and QYLD have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRAY or QYLD?

On fees, QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAY or QYLD?

QYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAY or QYLD?

DRAY has the higher dividend yield at 89.20%, compared with 11.46% for QYLD.

What is the main difference between DRAY and QYLD?

DRAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRAY and 0.60% for QYLD.