PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAY vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAY vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRAY achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than GDXY's -18.24% return.


DRAY

1D
0.34%
1M
-9.99%
6M
-27.98%
YTD
-28.70%
1Y
-42.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDXY

1D
-0.70%
1M
-10.91%
6M
-24.97%
YTD
-18.24%
1Y
15.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAY vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAY and GDXY is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAY vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAY
DRAY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DRAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRAY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
DRAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRAY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAY vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DRAYGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.10

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

0.43

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.13

0.99

-2.12

DRAY vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRAY Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRAY and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAY vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAY drawdown since its inception was -57.87%, which is greater than GDXY's maximum drawdown of -34.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAY and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAYGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.87%

-34.98%

-22.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.87%

-34.98%

-22.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.25%

-34.37%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.92%

-7.72%

-25.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.71%

15.22%

+22.49%

Volatility

DRAY vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF (DRAY) has a higher volatility of 14.35% compared to YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) at 10.71%. This indicates that DRAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAYGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.35%

10.71%

+3.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.35%

33.14%

+1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.33%

38.96%

+3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.33%

32.54%

+9.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.33%

32.54%

+9.79%

DRAY vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAY vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

DRAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.99%, more than GDXY's 85.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
DRAY
YieldMax DKNG Option Income Strategy ETF
101.99%32.48%0.00%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
85.43%52.13%23.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAY and GDXY have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRAY has higher volatility (14.35%) compared to GDXY (10.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DRAY dropped -57.87% vs GDXY's -34.98%.

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 15.09% vs -42.41% for DRAY. On fees, DRAY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 10.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 15.09% return vs -42.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DRAY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

DRAY has the higher dividend yield at 101.99%, compared with 85.43% for GDXY.

DRAY is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXY is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DRAY and 1.08% for GDXY.

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.39 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAY and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer