PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DRAM vs. TRUT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DRAM vs. TRUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DRAM

1D
0.20%
1M
64.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TRUT

1D
-1.46%
1M
16.68%
YTD
25.30%
6M
24.37%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. TRUT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and TRUT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026

0.61

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DRAM vs. TRUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF (TRUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DRAM vs. TRUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DRAMTRUTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

341.95

2.39

+339.56

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. TRUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum TRUT drawdown of -18.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and TRUT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DRAMTRUTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-18.55%

+8.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.46%

+1.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-5.17%

+3.53%

Volatility

DRAM vs. TRUT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DRAMTRUTDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.92%

21.53%

+52.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.92%

21.53%

+52.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.92%

21.53%

+52.39%

DRAM vs. TRUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUT's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

DRAM vs. TRUT - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TRUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%.


PositionTTM2025
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%
TRUT
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF
0.19%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DRAM and TRUT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRUT is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRUT is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

TRUT has the higher dividend yield at 0.19%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.13% for TRUT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and TRUT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer