DRAM vs. SPMO
DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. DRAM is actively managed, while SPMO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
DRAM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DRAM
- 1D
- -3.76%
- 1M
- -16.92%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- 6M
- 20.51%
- YTD
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 28.09%
- 3Y*
- 37.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.21%
- 10Y*
- 19.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.23B | $4.59B | $3.52B | |
| $331.54M | $346.70M | $350.59M |
DRAM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 86.56% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 25.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DRAM and SPMO is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.89 |
DRAM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DRAM
SPMO
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Technology
DRAM
SPMO
Basic Materials
DRAM
-
SPMO
Communication Services
DRAM
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
DRAM
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
DRAM
-
SPMO
Energy
DRAM
-
SPMO
Healthcare
DRAM
-
SPMO
Industrials
DRAM
-
SPMO
Real Estate
DRAM
-
SPMO
Utilities
DRAM
-
SPMO
Financial Services
DRAM
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DRAM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
DRAM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPMO
DRAM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DRAM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DRAM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -44.44%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DRAM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.44% | -30.95% | -13.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.60% | -11.03% | -26.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -4.62% | -5.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.29% | — |
Volatility
DRAM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DRAM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.96% | 23.90% | +77.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 100.96% | 20.60% | +80.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 100.96% | 20.92% | +80.04% |
DRAM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
DRAM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DRAM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.13% for SPMO.
Find the right allocation for DRAM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer