PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
DRAM vs. QDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

DRAM vs. QDIV

Last updated Aug 6, 2026
Documentation

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and QDIV (Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while QDIV is a Quality Factor fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality High Dividend Index. DRAM is actively managed, while QDIV is passively managed. Their -0.38 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QDIV.

Performance

DRAM vs. QDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

DRAM

1D
-2.10%
1M
-17.02%
6M
—
YTD
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
—

QDIV

1D
-0.45%
1M
5.69%
6M
6.42%
YTD
17.33%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
10.80%
5Y*
8.50%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

DRAM

Roundhill Memory ETF
$4.16B$4.38B$3.61B

QDIV

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF
$42.16K$79.98K$129.60K

DRAM vs. QDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF		99.04%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF		10.78%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and QDIV is -0.38, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

-0.38

DRAM vs. QDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
DRAM
QDIV

Technology

100.0%
10.7%

Basic Materials

-

2.1%

Communication Services

-

3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.8%

Consumer Defensive

-

22.1%

Energy

-

8.9%

Healthcare

-

13.5%

Industrials

-

16.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

-2.3%
20.1%

Technology

DRAM
100.0%
QDIV
10.7%

Basic Materials

DRAM

-

QDIV
2.1%

Communication Services

DRAM

-

QDIV
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DRAM

-

QDIV
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

DRAM

-

QDIV
22.1%

Energy

DRAM

-

QDIV
8.9%

Healthcare

DRAM

-

QDIV
13.5%

Industrials

DRAM

-

QDIV
16.6%

Real Estate

DRAM

-

QDIV

-

Utilities

DRAM

-

QDIV

-

Financial Services

DRAM
-2.3%
QDIV
20.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Roundhill Memory ETF

Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF

Often compared with DRAM:
DRAM vs. SMHDRAM vs. MUDRAM vs. SOXXDRAM vs. SOXQDRAM vs. AISDRAM vs. QTUMDRAM vs. EWY
Often compared with QDIV:
QDIV vs. SCHDQDIV vs. DGRWQDIV vs. SPYQDIV vs. QQQQDIV vs. DGROQDIV vs. SPHDQDIV vs. DVY

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. QDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QDIV
QDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DRAM vs. QDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF (QDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

DRAMQDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

—

1.74

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

—

2.66

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

—

1.31

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

—

2.69

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

—

6.85

—

DRAM vs. QDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. QDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -44.44%, which is greater than QDIV's maximum drawdown of -41.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and QDIV.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

DRAMQDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.44%

-41.20%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-7.97%

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-16.81%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-18.52%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.42%

-0.45%

-32.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.32%

-5.47%

-5.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.12%

—

Volatility

DRAM vs. QDIV - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

DRAMQDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

4.86%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

9.14%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.91%

12.32%

+87.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

99.91%

15.31%

+84.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

99.91%

19.34%

+80.57%

DRAM vs. QDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIV's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. QDIV - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QDIV
Global X S&P 500 Quality Dividend ETF		2.77%3.13%2.88%3.26%3.02%2.44%3.06%2.84%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

DRAM and QDIV have a correlation of -0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDIV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDIV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

QDIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while QDIV is Quality Factor. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.20% for QDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DRAM and QDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer