DRAM vs. PLTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

DRAM vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAM

• 1D: -14.25%
• 1M: 31.05%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -18.15%
• YTD: -42.11%
• 6M: -48.01%
• 1Y: -26.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	156.37%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-25.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and PLTW is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.16

DRAM vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAM	PLTW
Technology	100.0%	20.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DRAM	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.97	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.98	—

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -19.97%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAM	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.97%	-52.65%	+32.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.25%	-52.65%	+38.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-23.35%	+20.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAM	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	93.22%	61.56%	+31.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	93.22%	74.29%	+18.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	93.22%	74.29%	+18.93%

DRAM vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.83%.

Position	TTM	2025
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	151.83%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRAM and PLTW in my portfolio?

DRAM and PLTW have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRAM or PLTW?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAM or PLTW?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAM or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 151.83%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between DRAM and PLTW?

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.99% for PLTW.