DRAM vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. DRAM charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

DRAM vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 64.14%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 1.81%
• 6M: 2.20%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.41%
• 5Y*: 3.47%
• 10Y*: 2.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAM vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	151.12%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between DRAM and MINT is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026	-0.20

Return for Risk

DRAM vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAM vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAM	MINT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	17.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	5.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	2.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	341.95	2.47	+339.48

Drawdowns

DRAM vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAM drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAM and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAM	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-4.62%	-5.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.05%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-0.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.64%	-0.17%	-1.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAM	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.20%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	73.92%	0.27%	+73.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.92%	0.58%	+73.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.92%	0.95%	+72.97%

DRAM vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAM has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAM vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.28%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DRAM and MINT in my portfolio?

DRAM and MINT have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DRAM or MINT?

On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAM or MINT?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAM or MINT?

MINT has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between DRAM and MINT?

DRAM is categorized as Technology Equities, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for DRAM and 0.36% for MINT.