DRAG vs. ASHR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DRAG (Roundhill China Dragons ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund) are both China Equities funds. DRAG is actively managed, while ASHR is passively managed. DRAG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.

Performance

DRAG vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DRAG

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHR

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 3.02%
• YTD: 10.11%
• 6M: 13.67%
• 1Y: 39.07%
• 3Y*: 12.07%
• 5Y*: -1.24%
• 10Y*: 5.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRAG vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	7.39%

DRAG vs. ASHR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DRAG	ASHR
Consumer Cyclical	72.4%	6.7%
Communication Services	17.3%	0.8%
Technology	10.2%	26.3%
Basic Materials	-	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.3%
Energy	-	2.7%
Financial Services	-	20.4%
Healthcare	-	4.9%
Industrials	-	16.7%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Utilities	-	3.0%

Return for Risk

DRAG vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHR

ASHR Risk / Return Rank: 75
ASHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
ASHR Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ASHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ASHR Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRAG vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill China Dragons ETF (DRAG) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRAG	ASHR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.22	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.23	—

Drawdowns

DRAG vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRAG drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRAG and ASHR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRAG	ASHR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-51.30%	+51.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.69%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-33.12%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-15.63%	+15.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	0.00%	-29.18%	+29.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DRAG	ASHR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.87%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.00%	16.84%	-16.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.00%	23.89%	-23.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.00%	24.06%	-24.06%

DRAG vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRAG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

DRAG vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison

DRAG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares Fund	2.10%	2.31%	1.13%	2.48%	1.13%	0.88%	0.81%	0.98%	1.32%	0.84%	0.73%	30.13%
DRAG Roundhill China Dragons ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, DRAG or ASHR?

On fees, DRAG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DRAG or ASHR?

DRAG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DRAG or ASHR?

ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.00% for DRAG.

What is the main difference between DRAG and ASHR?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for DRAG and 0.65% for ASHR.