DOXLX vs. SABA
DOXLX (Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund) and SABA (Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II) are both Global Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, DOXLX returned 6.16%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for SABA. Their 0.29 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
DOXLX vs. SABA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOXLX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than SABA's 6.04% return.
DOXLX
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 6.16%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.83%
SABA
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- -2.93%
- 3Y*
- 9.95%
- 5Y*
- 3.53%
- 10Y*
- 2.95%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $257.87K | $401.38K | $414.25K |
DOXLX vs. SABA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOXLX Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund | 0.30% | 11.60% | 0.63% | 12.48% | 0.43% |
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 6.04% | -0.31% | 31.32% | -2.77% | -1.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOXLX and SABA is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2022 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOXLX vs. SABA — Risk / Return Rank
DOXLX
SABA
DOXLX vs. SABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DOXLX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOXLX | SABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.97 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | -0.28 | +1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | -0.53 | +2.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOXLX vs. SABA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOXLX drawdown since its inception was -8.14%, smaller than the maximum SABA drawdown of -32.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOXLX and SABA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOXLX | SABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -32.37% | +24.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.33% | -10.45% | +6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.12% | -14.96% | +8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -3.12% | +0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -7.55% | +5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 5.58% | -3.89% |
Volatility
DOXLX vs. SABA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DOXLX) is 1.21%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that DOXLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOXLX | SABA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.21% | 3.19% | -1.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.58% | 8.63% | -5.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 11.56% | -7.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 14.60% | -9.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.43% | 16.64% | -11.21% |
Dividends
DOXLX vs. SABA - Dividend Comparison
DOXLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than SABA's 9.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOXLX Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund | 3.51% | 4.14% | 4.81% | 3.36% | 4.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SABA Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II | 9.56% | 9.65% | 8.32% | 11.43% | 9.14% | 7.19% | 4.00% | 6.68% | 5.81% | 4.44% | 4.63% | 4.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOXLX and SABA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SABA has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to DOXLX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOXLX dropped -8.14% vs SABA's -32.37%.
DOXLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOXLX and SABA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer