PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOV vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DOV vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dover Corporation (DOV) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOV achieves a 10.81% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, DOV has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 15.85%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.72% annualized return.


DOV

1D
1.78%
1M
-1.46%
6M
7.16%
YTD
10.81%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
14.24%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
15.85%

KMB

1D
2.26%
1M
10.71%
6M
17.81%
YTD
14.34%
1Y
-8.86%
3Y*
-2.10%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
1.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOV vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOV
Dover Corporation
10.81%5.24%23.35%15.22%-24.34%45.73%11.53%65.80%-11.11%37.68%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
14.34%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between DOV and KMB is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985

0.28

The correlation between DOV and KMB shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

DOV:

$29.00B

KMB:

$37.31B

EPS

DOV:

$8.02

KMB:

$5.93

PE Ratio

DOV:

26.84

KMB:

18.96

PEG Ratio

DOV:

1.11

KMB:

3.28

PS Ratio

DOV:

3.57

KMB:

2.26

PB Ratio

DOV:

3.91

KMB:

20.85

Total Revenue (TTM)

DOV:

$8.28B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DOV:

$3.27B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

DOV:

$1.78B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOV vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOV
DOV Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
DOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOV vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dover Corporation (DOV) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOVKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.95

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

-0.36

+1.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.07

-0.53

+2.61

DOV vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOV Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOV and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOV vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOV drawdown since its inception was -58.22%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOV and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOVKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.22%

-36.97%

-21.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.34%

-29.60%

+14.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.59%

-34.06%

+7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.56%

-34.06%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.24%

-34.06%

-11.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.27%

-19.25%

+11.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.13%

-8.87%

-4.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.87%

19.94%

-13.07%

Volatility

DOV vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Dover Corporation (DOV) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) have volatilities of 8.29% and 8.21%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOVKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

8.21%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.70%

18.09%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.96%

26.74%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.96%

20.49%

+4.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.67%

21.18%

+5.49%

Dividends

DOV vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

DOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than KMB's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOV
Dover Corporation
0.97%1.06%1.09%1.32%1.48%1.10%1.56%1.68%2.55%1.80%2.30%2.67%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.52%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Financials

DOV vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Dover Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.05B
4.16B
(DOV) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DOV vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Dover Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
38.9%
36.9%
Portfolio components
DOV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Dover Corporation reported a gross profit of 798.14M and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

DOV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Dover Corporation reported an operating income of 305.91M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

DOV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Dover Corporation reported a net income of 238.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DOV and KMB have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOV has higher volatility (8.29%) compared to KMB (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOV dropped -58.22% vs KMB's -36.97%.

DOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOV and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer