PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOL vs. RODM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOL vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOL achieves a 16.21% return, which is significantly higher than RODM's 10.99% return. Over the past 10 years, DOL has outperformed RODM with an annualized return of 9.92%, while RODM has yielded a comparatively lower 9.00% annualized return.


DOL

1D
1.17%
1M
2.93%
YTD
16.21%
6M
18.04%
1Y
33.48%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*
9.92%

RODM

1D
-0.15%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
10.99%
6M
11.30%
1Y
25.78%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
9.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOL vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
16.21%37.35%4.08%16.77%-6.72%11.54%-3.22%19.47%-12.93%22.25%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
10.99%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DOL and RODM is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.86

The correlation between DOL and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOL vs. RODM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOL
RODM

Financial Services

20.9%
26.6%

Technology

14.3%
10.5%

Industrials

13.9%
16.7%

Healthcare

7.9%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

7.2%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.9%
6.0%

Utilities

5.6%
4.8%

Basic Materials

5.3%
6.4%

Communication Services

5.0%
5.5%

Energy

4.3%
6.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.5%

Financial Services

DOL
20.9%
RODM
26.6%

Technology

DOL
14.3%
RODM
10.5%

Industrials

DOL
13.9%
RODM
16.7%

Healthcare

DOL
7.9%
RODM
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

DOL
7.2%
RODM
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

DOL
6.9%
RODM
6.0%

Utilities

DOL
5.6%
RODM
4.8%

Basic Materials

DOL
5.3%
RODM
6.4%

Communication Services

DOL
5.0%
RODM
5.5%

Energy

DOL
4.3%
RODM
6.3%

Real Estate

DOL
1.1%
RODM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOL vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOL
DOL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
DOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOL Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOL vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOLRODMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.42

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.54

-0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.81

14.05

-3.24

DOL vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOL Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOL and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOL vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOL drawdown since its inception was -60.79%, which is greater than RODM's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL and RODM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOLRODMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.79%

-35.98%

-24.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-7.10%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-10.58%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.57%

-28.85%

+4.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-35.98%

-0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.42%

+1.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.60%

-6.36%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.78%

+1.24%

Volatility

DOL vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) has a higher volatility of 5.50% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.36%. This indicates that DOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOLRODMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.50%

3.36%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

8.78%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.62%

10.94%

+4.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.50%

13.45%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.72%

15.21%

+1.51%

DOL vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOL vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

DOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than RODM's 2.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
2.41%2.83%3.78%4.02%4.47%3.58%2.82%3.50%4.03%3.17%3.58%3.66%
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.80%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOL and RODM have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOL has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to RODM (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOL dropped -60.79% vs RODM's -35.98%.

On 10-year performance, DOL leads with 9.92% vs 9.00% for RODM. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DOL has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 9.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for DOL.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 2.41% for DOL.

DOL tracks WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Index, while RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DOL and 0.29% for RODM.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOL and RODM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer