PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOL vs. EFAD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOL vs. EFAD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOL achieves a 16.45% return, which is significantly higher than EFAD's 5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, DOL has outperformed EFAD with an annualized return of 9.88%, while EFAD has yielded a comparatively lower 4.31% annualized return.


DOL

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.53%
6M
9.92%
YTD
16.45%
1Y
31.66%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
9.88%
ALL TIME*
5.86%

EFAD

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.06%
6M
4.05%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
9.86%
3Y*
7.89%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
4.31%
ALL TIME*
2.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$706.22K$768.00K$1.02M
$189.36K$164.64K$138.70K

DOL vs. EFAD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
16.45%37.35%4.08%16.77%-6.72%11.54%-3.22%19.47%-12.93%22.25%
EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
5.98%15.87%-1.88%11.91%-21.34%8.41%8.75%24.66%-11.71%22.14%

Correlation

The correlation between DOL and EFAD is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2014

0.86

The correlation between DOL and EFAD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOL vs. EFAD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOL
EFAD

Financial Services

24.6%
12.5%

Technology

17.6%
13.9%

Industrials

15.0%
14.2%

Healthcare

8.0%
20.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.5%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%

-

Utilities

5.6%
7.9%

Communication Services

4.8%
5.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
9.9%

Energy

3.7%
1.3%

Real Estate

1.0%
4.1%

Financial Services

DOL
24.6%
EFAD
12.5%

Technology

DOL
17.6%
EFAD
13.9%

Industrials

DOL
15.0%
EFAD
14.2%

Healthcare

DOL
8.0%
EFAD
20.9%

Consumer Defensive

DOL
7.5%
EFAD
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DOL
7.4%
EFAD

-

Utilities

DOL
5.6%
EFAD
7.9%

Communication Services

DOL
4.8%
EFAD
5.9%

Basic Materials

DOL
4.8%
EFAD
9.9%

Energy

DOL
3.7%
EFAD
1.3%

Real Estate

DOL
1.0%
EFAD
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOL vs. EFAD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DOL
DOL Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
DOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
DOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EFAD
EFAD Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EFAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFAD Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
EFAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFAD Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DOL vs. EFAD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DOLEFADDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.14

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.01

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.46

3.38

+7.08

DOL vs. EFAD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the EFAD Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOL and EFAD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DOL vs. EFAD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOL drawdown since its inception was -60.79%, which is greater than EFAD's maximum drawdown of -35.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL and EFAD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOLEFADDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.79%

-35.74%

-25.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-10.18%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-13.35%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.57%

-35.74%

+11.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-35.74%

-0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-1.16%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.54%

-10.29%

-3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.05%

-0.04%

Volatility

DOL vs. EFAD - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) has a higher volatility of 4.39% compared to ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF (EFAD) at 3.90%. This indicates that DOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOLEFADDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.39%

3.90%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

11.45%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.88%

13.58%

+2.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.58%

14.50%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

15.32%

+1.07%

DOL vs. EFAD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAD's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOL vs. EFAD - Dividend Comparison

DOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than EFAD's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
2.45%2.83%3.78%4.02%4.47%3.58%2.82%3.50%4.03%3.17%3.58%3.66%
EFAD
ProShares MSCI EAFE Dividend Growers ETF
2.58%2.83%2.64%2.29%1.76%2.98%1.49%2.05%2.37%2.42%2.88%1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOL and EFAD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DOL has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to EFAD (3.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOL dropped -60.79% vs EFAD's -35.74%.

On 10-year performance, DOL leads with 9.88% vs 4.31% for EFAD. On fees, DOL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EFAD has been the lower-risk option at 3.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DOL has performed better with a 9.88% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for EFAD.

EFAD has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 2.45% for DOL.

DOL tracks WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Index, while EFAD tracks MSCI EAFE Dividend Masters Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DOL and 0.50% for EFAD.

DOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOL and EFAD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer