PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DOL vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DOL vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOL achieves a 14.27% return, which is significantly lower than FDT's 25.50% return. Over the past 10 years, DOL has underperformed FDT with an annualized return of 9.61%, while FDT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.


DOL

1D
-0.42%
1M
5.12%
YTD
14.27%
6M
18.14%
1Y
29.70%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
9.61%

FDT

1D
-0.64%
1M
5.22%
YTD
25.50%
6M
28.63%
1Y
55.05%
3Y*
30.08%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
10.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DOL vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
14.27%37.35%4.08%16.77%-6.72%11.54%-3.22%19.47%-12.93%22.25%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
25.50%52.21%6.97%15.03%-19.51%11.43%4.29%16.82%-19.98%34.42%

Correlation

The correlation between DOL and FDT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2011

0.87

The correlation between DOL and FDT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

DOL vs. FDT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DOL
FDT

Financial Services

24.3%
10.2%

Industrials

15.9%
34.0%

Technology

14.1%
8.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.6%
2.8%

Utilities

6.0%
5.2%

Communication Services

5.4%
2.7%

Basic Materials

5.1%
9.6%

Energy

4.7%
9.2%

Real Estate

1.2%
5.3%

Financial Services

DOL
24.3%
FDT
10.2%

Industrials

DOL
15.9%
FDT
34.0%

Technology

DOL
14.1%
FDT
8.1%

Healthcare

DOL
8.3%
FDT
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DOL
7.6%
FDT
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

DOL
7.6%
FDT
2.8%

Utilities

DOL
6.0%
FDT
5.2%

Communication Services

DOL
5.4%
FDT
2.7%

Basic Materials

DOL
5.1%
FDT
9.6%

Energy

DOL
4.7%
FDT
9.2%

Real Estate

DOL
1.2%
FDT
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DOL vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DOL
DOL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DOL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
DOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DOL vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DOLFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.54

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

4.13

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

16.12

-6.22

DOL vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the FDT Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOL and FDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DOLFDTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

3.00

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.69

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.40

-0.12

Drawdowns

DOL vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOL drawdown since its inception was -60.79%, which is greater than FDT's maximum drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOL and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DOLFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.79%

-46.10%

-14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-13.41%

+2.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.44%

-14.29%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.57%

-33.18%

+8.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.99%

-46.10%

+10.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-1.59%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.63%

-10.78%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

3.43%

-0.42%

Volatility

DOL vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund (DOL) is 5.28%, while First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that DOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DOLFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

7.23%

-1.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

15.91%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

18.42%

-3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.38%

18.23%

-2.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

18.52%

-1.82%

DOL vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOL has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

DOL vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

DOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.45%, less than FDT's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DOL
WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Fund
2.45%2.83%3.78%4.02%4.47%3.58%2.82%3.50%4.03%3.17%3.58%3.66%
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.84%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


DOL and FDT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDT has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to DOL (5.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOL dropped -60.79% vs FDT's -46.10%.

On 10-year performance, FDT leads with 10.91% vs 9.61% for DOL. On fees, DOL is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, DOL has been the lower-risk option at 5.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDT has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 9.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DOL is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FDT.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 2.45% for DOL.

DOL tracks WisdomTree International LargeCap Dividend Index, while FDT tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for DOL and 0.80% for FDT.

FDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DOL and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer