DOG vs. VOO
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DOG is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DOG returned -11.31%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for VOO. At a correlation of -0.91, they often move in opposite directions. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DOG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.92% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, DOG has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -11.31%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
DOG
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -2.03%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- -14.29%
- 3Y*
- -8.19%
- 5Y*
- -5.62%
- 10Y*
- -11.31%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
DOG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.92% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -21.51% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and VOO is -0.83, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | -0.91 |
The correlation between DOG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
DOG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DOG
VOO
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
DOG
VOO
Basic Materials
DOG
-
VOO
Communication Services
DOG
-
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
DOG
-
VOO
Consumer Defensive
DOG
-
VOO
Energy
DOG
-
VOO
Healthcare
DOG
-
VOO
Industrials
DOG
-
VOO
Real Estate
DOG
-
VOO
Technology
DOG
-
VOO
Utilities
DOG
-
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
VOO
DOG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DOG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.36 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.84 | 2.75 | -3.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 12.42 | -13.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DOG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.73%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.73% | -33.99% | -58.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.09% | -8.90% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.16% | -18.69% | -10.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.35% | -24.52% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.95% | -33.99% | -36.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.67% | -2.34% | -90.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.41% | -3.68% | -62.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.18% | 1.97% | +7.21% |
Volatility
DOG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 4.36% and 4.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.36% | 4.34% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 9.58% | +0.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.56% | 12.27% | +0.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 16.88% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 18.03% | -0.52% |
DOG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.52% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and VOO have a correlation of -0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.73% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs -11.31% for DOG. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs -11.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
DOG is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer