DOG vs. MSFD
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DOG returned -8.28%/yr vs -8.15%/yr for MSFD. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
DOG vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 6.94% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
MSFD
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | -4.87% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 6.94% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and MSFD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.48 |
The correlation between DOG and MSFD shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
MSFD
DOG vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | 0.15 | -1.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | 0.42 | -1.84 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.05 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 0.14 | -1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 0.39 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.15 | -1.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.54 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.69% | -59.90% | -32.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -23.25% | +8.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.77% | -40.50% | +11.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.61% | -51.77% | -40.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -41.58% | -24.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 8.44% | +0.45% |
Volatility
DOG vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 2.98%, while Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 9.49% | -6.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 21.86% | -12.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 25.12% | -12.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 26.11% | -11.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 26.11% | -8.62% |
DOG vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than MSFD's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.92% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and MSFD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.69% vs MSFD's -59.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -8.15% vs -8.28% for DOG. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -8.15% return vs -8.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MSFD.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 2.92% for MSFD.
DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer