DOG vs. METD

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and METD (Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. DOG is passively managed, while METD is actively managed. Over the past year, DOG returned -13.86% vs 24.41% for METD. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for METD.

Performance

DOG vs. METD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than METD's 10.02% return.

DOG

• 1D: -0.51%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: -5.42%
• YTD: -6.75%
• 1Y: -13.86%
• 3Y*: -7.85%
• 5Y*: -5.65%
• 10Y*: -11.12%
• ALL TIME*: -10.34%

METD

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: 3.04%
• 6M: 20.93%
• YTD: 10.02%
• 1Y: 24.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -11.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	$40.27M	$36.96M	$41.35M
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	$10.85M	$12.45M	$7.88M

DOG vs. METD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	-6.75%	-8.40%	-5.82%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	10.02%	-17.33%	-15.84%

Correlation

The correlation between DOG and METD is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.41
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

DOG vs. METD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DOG

DOG Risk / Return Rank: 2
DOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
DOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DOG Martin Ratio Rank: 0

METD

METD Risk / Return Rank: 32
METD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
METD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
METD Omega Ratio Rank: 35
METD Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
METD Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DOG vs. METD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DOG	METD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	0.74	-1.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.38	1.24	-2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.85	1.17	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	1.09	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.48	2.50	-3.97

DOG vs. METD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DOG Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the METD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DOG and METD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DOG vs. METD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.90%, which is greater than METD's maximum drawdown of -46.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and METD.

Drawdown Indicators

	DOG	METD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.90%	-46.03%	-46.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.02%	-26.03%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.93%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-92.81%	-29.29%	-63.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.59%	-28.87%	-37.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.60%	11.39%	-2.79%

Volatility

DOG vs. METD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 3.74%, while Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF (METD) has a volatility of 15.23%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than METD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DOG	METD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.74%	15.23%	-11.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.94%	30.46%	-20.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.59%	40.18%	-27.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.83%	37.75%	-22.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.49%	37.75%	-20.26%

DOG vs. METD - Expense Ratio Comparison

DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than METD's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

DOG vs. METD - Dividend Comparison

DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than METD's 2.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DOG ProShares Short Dow30	3.38%	3.65%	5.72%	4.54%	0.41%	0.00%	0.14%	1.54%	0.86%	0.04%
METD Direxion Daily META Bear 1X ETF	2.51%	3.35%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DOG and METD in my portfolio?

DOG and METD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DOG or METD?

METD has higher volatility (15.23%) compared to DOG (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.90% vs METD's -46.03%.

Which ETF is better, DOG or METD?

On 1-year performance, METD leads with 24.41% vs -13.86% for DOG. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DOG or METD?

Over the 1-year period, METD has performed better with a 24.41% return vs -13.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DOG or METD?

DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for METD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DOG or METD?

DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.38%, compared with 2.51% for METD.

What is the main difference between DOG and METD?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 1.00% for METD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.74 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.