DOG vs. EMTY
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds from ProShares - DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DOG returned -5.31%/yr vs -2.85%/yr for EMTY. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.
Performance
DOG vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly lower than EMTY's 1.41% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
EMTY
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 4.32%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 0.17%
- 3Y*
- -4.59%
- 5Y*
- -2.85%
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | 5.67% | -19.21% | -20.45% | -18.43% | 3.55% | -5.29% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 1.41% | -1.76% | -4.13% | 0.27% | 4.32% | -37.39% | -31.92% | -8.65% | 11.16% | -14.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and EMTY is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DOG and EMTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
EMTY
DOG vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | 0.01 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | 0.13 | -1.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 1.02 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 0.01 | -0.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 0.01 | -1.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | 0.01 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.13 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.43 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and EMTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.69% | -77.62% | -15.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -14.00% | -0.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.77% | -30.83% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | -30.83% | -3.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.61% | -74.69% | -17.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -54.00% | -12.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 8.11% | +0.78% |
Volatility
DOG vs. EMTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 2.98%, while ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY) has a volatility of 6.31%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | EMTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 6.31% | -3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 12.39% | -3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 17.71% | -5.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 22.37% | -7.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 25.68% | -8.19% |
DOG vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than EMTY's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF | 3.44% | 3.83% | 6.00% | 4.41% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.82% | 0.62% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and EMTY have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMTY has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.69% vs EMTY's -77.62%.
On 5-year performance, EMTY leads with -2.85% vs -5.31% for DOG. On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMTY has performed better with a -2.85% return vs -5.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for DOG.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.44% for EMTY.
DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 0.66% for EMTY.
EMTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.01 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and EMTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer