DOG vs. AMZD
DOG (ProShares Short Dow30) and AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - DOG tracks the DJ Industrial Average (-100%) while AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DOG returned -8.28%/yr vs -22.66%/yr for AMZD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DOG charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for AMZD.
Performance
DOG vs. AMZD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DOG achieves a -4.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMZD's -8.90% return.
DOG
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- -4.15%
- 6M
- -4.06%
- 1Y
- -12.72%
- 3Y*
- -8.28%
- 5Y*
- -5.31%
- 10Y*
- -11.18%
AMZD
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- 8.70%
- YTD
- -8.90%
- 6M
- -8.11%
- 1Y
- -19.87%
- 3Y*
- -22.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOG vs. AMZD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | -4.15% | -8.40% | -5.62% | -7.05% | -4.87% |
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -8.90% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -46.50% | 45.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between DOG and AMZD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DOG vs. AMZD — Risk / Return Rank
DOG
AMZD
DOG vs. AMZD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) and Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DOG | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | -0.66 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | -0.80 | -0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.84 | 0.90 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | -0.71 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.54 | +0.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DOG | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.05 | -0.66 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | -0.59 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
DOG vs. AMZD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DOG drawdown since its inception was -92.69%, which is greater than AMZD's maximum drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DOG and AMZD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DOG | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.69% | -73.05% | -19.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.63% | -28.27% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.77% | -59.20% | +30.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.61% | -70.36% | -22.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.39% | -49.11% | -17.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.89% | 13.24% | -4.35% |
Volatility
DOG vs. AMZD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short Dow30 (DOG) is 2.98%, while Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) has a volatility of 7.23%. This indicates that DOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DOG | AMZD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 7.23% | -4.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.37% | 20.49% | -11.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.13% | 30.15% | -18.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.79% | 33.41% | -18.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 33.41% | -15.92% |
DOG vs. AMZD - Expense Ratio Comparison
DOG has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZD's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
DOG vs. AMZD - Dividend Comparison
DOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than AMZD's 3.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.44% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DOG ProShares Short Dow30 | 3.49% | 3.65% | 5.72% | 4.54% | 0.41% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.54% | 0.86% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DOG and AMZD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZD has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to DOG (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DOG dropped -92.69% vs AMZD's -73.05%.
On 3-year performance, DOG leads with -8.28% vs -22.66% for AMZD. On fees, DOG is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, DOG has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DOG has performed better with a -8.28% return vs -22.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DOG is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
DOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 3.44% for AMZD.
DOG tracks DJ Industrial Average (-100%), while AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for DOG and 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.66 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DOG and AMZD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer