AMZD vs. MSFD
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds from Direxion - AMZD tracks the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMZD returned -23.29%/yr vs -8.15%/yr for MSFD. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
AMZD vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than MSFD's 6.94% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -9.52%
- 1Y
- -21.40%
- 3Y*
- -23.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- -6.67%
- YTD
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 8.58%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- -8.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -11.09% | -9.84% | -30.80% | -46.50% | 45.25% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 6.94% | -13.36% | -7.86% | -35.90% | 3.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and MSFD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2022 | 0.61 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMZD and MSFD has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.61, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
MSFD
AMZD vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | 0.15 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | 0.42 | -1.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.14 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 0.39 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | 0.15 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | -0.54 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -59.90% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -23.25% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.20% | -40.50% | -18.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.07% | -51.77% | -19.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.08% | -41.58% | -7.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.17% | 8.44% | +4.73% |
Volatility
AMZD vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) is 7.11%, while Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD) has a volatility of 9.49%. This indicates that AMZD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 9.49% | -2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.34% | 21.86% | -1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.05% | 25.12% | +4.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 26.11% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 26.11% | +7.29% |
AMZD vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than MSFD's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.52% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.92% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and MSFD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MSFD has higher volatility (9.49%) compared to AMZD (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZD dropped -73.05% vs MSFD's -59.90%.
On 3-year performance, MSFD leads with -8.15% vs -23.29% for AMZD. On fees, MSFD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, AMZD has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MSFD has performed better with a -8.15% return vs -23.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MSFD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZD has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 2.92% for MSFD.
AMZD tracks Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 1.06% for MSFD.
MSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer