AMZD vs. AMZW
AMZD (Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares) and AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZD is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Amazon.com, Inc. (-100%), while AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. AMZD is passively managed, while AMZW is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.99, they often move in opposite directions. AMZD charges 1.09%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZW.
Performance
AMZD vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD achieves a -11.09% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's 10.99% return.
AMZD
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 4.58%
- YTD
- -11.09%
- 6M
- -9.52%
- 1Y
- -21.40%
- 3Y*
- -23.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZW
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- -5.70%
- YTD
- 10.99%
- 6M
- 8.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | -11.09% | -9.18% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 10.99% | 7.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD and AMZW is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025 | -0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD
AMZW
AMZD vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares (AMZD) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.61 | 0.55 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
AMZD vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD drawdown since its inception was -73.05%, which is greater than AMZW's maximum drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD and AMZW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.05% | -26.79% | -46.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -71.07% | -8.60% | -62.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.08% | -8.88% | -40.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.17% | — | — |
Volatility
AMZD vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD | AMZW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.05% | 36.92% | -6.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 36.92% | -3.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.40% | 36.92% | -3.52% |
AMZD vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD has a 1.09% expense ratio, which is higher than AMZW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison
AMZD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than AMZW's 41.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZD Direxion Daily AMZN Bear 1X Shares | 3.52% | 3.61% | 5.15% | 6.83% | 2.45% |
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF | 41.70% | 25.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD and AMZW have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for AMZD.
AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 41.70%, compared with 3.52% for AMZD.
AMZD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while AMZW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.09% for AMZD and 0.99% for AMZW.
Find the right allocation for AMZD and AMZW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer